/fa/ - Fashion

>>17087158
>>17087527
are those bootcut jeans? also tfw no motorcore/funktional thread

>>14447247
Buy a bike

You need a driver for your cars... I'm your guy.

>>14032551

Does anyone remember those cool looking chink sneakers that were made for athletic performance, but had cool japanese characters on the side of the sole? They came in several colors, namely khaki and olive green.

>>13928578
Tell me about it

>>13893857
Prove smoking is bad, and not smoking twp packs a day. Anything in excess is bad for you. Smoking a pack a week has no negative health effects and is demonstrably true

>>13855841
Superior version

>>13798238
>climbing is obviously the most /fa/ sport
Incorrect, it's motorsports

>>13743090
yeah but these all suck

>>13665429
the people that unironically dress like this are no one you want to emulate. they are such fucking losers. like this isn't coming from envy they actually just suck as people and are usually vapid / completely uninteresting

t. top boarding school student, upper tier college, top tier fraternity in said sollege

>21
>M
>Urban Planning student

>>13539445
>21
>Male
>College, Urban Planning

>>13528395
>>13528400
>>13528932
>>13528985
>>13529330
1/?
Smoking is not bad for you

All associations of smoking and cancer are the result of non-randomized epidemiological studies, even in animals (hard science, actual experimental studies, with forced tubing to deliver tobacco 24/7, scientists are unable to induce lung cancer with tobacco smoke. In fact tobacco smoke sometimes extended the life spans in low doses and would protect against random induced lung cancer.

Now most will say “i have a relative who died from smoking a pack a day for 45 years”

This is a very biased “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy based arising from flawed anecdotal observation and incomplete information. You do not know if the smoking caused cancer. You see that he smoked and you blame the smoking for causing it.

I’m willing to bet that relative quit before he got cancer. As crazy as it may sound tobacco actually suppresses various cancer growth factors- the majority of smokers who get cancer are those who suddenly stop because these cancer growth factors like IGF-1, which were previously suppressed by the tobacco use, were “uperegulated”.

If you will find the following paper by cross, et al

“Carcinogenic effect of radon daughters, uranium ore dust and cigarette smoke in beagle dogs”

You will see that the tobacco smoke has an anti carcinogenic effects if anything the tobacco use bought that relative more years of life to which you should be thankful.

>>13510598
Lmao I smoked your ass last time in the smoking debate admit defeat and stop shilling your no smoking pussy agenda

>>13484528
Being a little bitch isn’t fashionable