/fa/ - Fashion

>>7525423
1100D camera i am actively trying to kill

lifetime of shutter on this piece of shit ~3000

>mirror selfies

>>7434349
>Film doesn't react to water you idiot
negatives, cameras, pictures do

>but film cameras in general withstand moisture better than their digital counterparts.

weather sealing is standard on most/all DSLR's today that aren't meant for kids toys

under water cams are dslr's in bags

>The required temperature that would 'ruin film'
vegas sun in a few hours will do it

>Do you see many advertisements for film cameras?

too old, nobody bus them anymore. Back before you were alive, film cameras represented the consumerist lifestyle.

$14.99 roll of film
$14.99 processing fee +prints of all images
$5.99 extra for negatives processed returned
$39.99 for genenric fujifilm
$5 pack of batteries

the costs kept adding and adding back in the day, which is why digital took over

>when digital cameras costs a lot more and is of more inconvenience

i only charge my batts once in 3-4 months if that i do not have a battery grip/life extension

>If you actually use disposable film cameras, then yes

outside of a handful of examples most film cameras are garbage

sad think is i probably have a better film camera than you


it sounds like you can't afford to drop a few grand on a decent DSLR and are bitter about it

>>7390667
my cheap cameras

nikon d90 i have had for 5+ years
canon 1100D my ex left behind, when i gave her, a canon 5d MKII last year for xmas...used as a beater. meaning take ebay pics with it, 4chan time stamps etc to keep the d90 actuations low

not pictured, all of my film SLR's that are sitting in a junk drawer