/fa/ - Fashion

>>17503858
>Why do you say it's not a "real speedmaster", what's the lore here?

Because what you were talking about is in no way related to the watch that NASA has certified for extra vehicular activities in space, in design nor movement.

The current Speedy that warrants the name is the Caliber 321 model, which is like $14,000. If you don’t care about the movement and just want a Speedmaster that looks like the original moon watch, then you can choose the co-axial version which goes for around $6k.

This thing >>17503784 is just one of Swatch’s endless and shitty attempts at making money off of the Speedmaster name. In fact if I recall that one just uses a basic bitch ETA automatic movement.