/fa/ - Fashion

Rating a few from the top, few from the bottom.

>>12137411
Looks normie. Pants are insanely tight and come off feminine. Boots are unappealing due to the proportion clash. Also, boot color is harsh given the gray coat. That scarf screams "my kid cut up my H&M scarf." 2/10

>>12137595
Ramones are wearing you. Pants are Zumiez tier; fit is atrocious. Coat is nice, but it looks cheap. The concept is there, but it's outplayed and your execution is sad. It even reflects in your face. 2/10

>>12137596
Your upper appears a mess, but it might be the picture quality. You're going a little far with the Vetements socks. DRKSHDW Vegans look decent nontheless. I definitely do not like that cheap looking button-up. 4/10 (need better picture).

>>12137687
Proportions are off. Everything looks cheap. And your feet look tiny. Such a simple fit, yet you made it look like complete garbage. 1/10

>>12137799
Congratulations on making designer clothing look less appealing than GAP. Go to the gym and work on your lady hips. 0/10

>>12137815
You look like a grown man, but dress like a 14 year old. Faded black pants look alright, a bit tight at the thighs perhaps. Old Skools are beat to death, and the whole thrifted army jacket is so 2010. You look like one of those people that has no wallet and carries all his cards in his iPhone case. 2/10

>>12137844
Shoes are equivalent to Payless. If you want the Stan Smith silhouette, just get Stan Smiths or a more expensive alternative. Pants looks cheap, straight out of PacSun. Iron the knees before you wear them. Long bomber looking thing is atrocious. Overall palette is boring. 3/10

>>12151859
I can see what you're going for, but your proportions are slightly off. I don't like the material of the striped shirt, and there's better alternatives. Very cheap-looking, but you seem poor. Striped shirt and socks also clash from afar. Judging from the surroundings, it seems appropriate for who you are and what you can afford. ok/10

cont..