/fa/ - Fashion

>>7765810
see: the thing is, the lows can look good af, but i bet this pair is, like, mens 8 or smthn, and as you go up in size they get longer, without balancing the weight out and they start to loose their profile and look clunky/clown-y imo.

i bet us m10 is about as big as you could go in the lows before they really start to loose it..
now, conversely i do think the mid/his look better in larger sizes and like children's shoes when smaller than, like 10 or so...

>>7650847
because i started posting the pictures on /fa/ long after their production stopped :)

They're alright.

>>6329527
4 me; hardly.

[not o.p.] why would anybody ever stop making this shoe... seriously. AF1's are so deep in the shadow- is nike just playin w/me? af1 is shit compared to pic.

>>6316734

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtOToiIDNRA

>>6116645
Well done. Yes, I like them. Pretty sure I was the one who started bringing attention to them with this image. Sadly, I can't get them in my size.