[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:

View post   
>> No.14716114 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14716114

>>14716109
Many of these fits rely on being attractive in the first place, but I think that's just fashion in general.

>> No.14495266 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14495266

>>14495257

>> No.14380668 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14380668

>> No.14271360 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1544579952888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14271360

>> No.14036219 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14036219

>> No.13917599 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13917599

Is it true that monochromatic fits make you look taller? I often dress similarly to pic related — dark grey or black high waist pants and a white or light grey top and I find it makes me look even taller than dressing all black would, because the waistline is more accentuated. I'm 6'0" though so I don't know if that makes a difference. What are your thoughts, /fa/?

>> No.13917541 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1543610251614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13917541

Is it true that monochromatic fits make you look taller? I often dress similarly to pic related — dark grey or black high waist pants and a white or light grey top and I find it makes me look even taller than dressing all black would, because the waistline is more accentuated. I'm 6'0" though so I don't know if that makes a difference. What are your thoughts, /fa/?

>> No.13884995 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1521370923912-fa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13884995

FUCK IT, JUST DUMP EVERYTHING
EVERY STYLE/CORE/AESTHETIC WELCOME

>> No.13280451 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1521802998372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13280451

>> No.13242995 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 1521370923912.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13242995

>> No.13231002 [View]
File: 39 KB, 500x749, 4AC2BBB0-BA4C-49DB-8211-8F431A9DDF48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13231002

w2c all clothing in this image

>> No.13230944 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 5e6345036e56fea94910bd7a89901baa4fb6548258108e17cfc97d32127454ff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13230944

Only high waisted pants allowed in this thread.

>> No.12472745 [View]
File: 39 KB, 500x749, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12472745

>>12472739
whoops didn't mean to post that but w/e

>> No.14777 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, high1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14777

I don't see the movement towards low waited tapered pants.
Literally makes you look like a fatass with a diaper, unless you are slim/asian.

Even if you are of a slim build, high wasted pants are superior.

Help me find brands that have high wasted pants

>> No.12362885 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, high1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12362885

I don't see the movement towards low waited tapered pants.
Literally makes you look like a fatass with a diaper, unless you are slim/asian.

Even if you are of a slim build, high wasted pants are superior.

Help me find brands that have high wasted pants

>> No.11898245 [View]
File: 31 KB, 500x749, 47702c0511f9d337d4559c3c4d4135d9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11898245

>> No.11609987 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, 6e52aeb7948db2d16d33322600a1efe0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11609987

>>11609938
>>11609974
Besides denim, another category of higher rise I'm sure many of us have been looking for are trousers, whether they be dressy or wool. many recommend thrift, but this is one of the aspects I have had a lot more trouble locating, especially in a slim fit. Besides tailoring, anyone have any trouser recommendations

>> No.11593007 [View]
File: 32 KB, 500x749, Tuck 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11593007

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]