/fa/ - Fashion

>>13119787
>seamaster....fucking why?

Because it sang to me when I tried it on. I have a fairly large wrist and forearm, so the 42mm looks fine and in proportion. It was between that and the Speedy, which I eventually acquired a few years later.

For me the Seamaster is the perfect water watch, and the Speedy is the perfect chronograph. But that's for me, not necessarily for others.

Some people don't seem to understand that some watches appeal to some people and not to others. We can always agree and disagree about objective standards (movement, etc.), but when it comes to aesthetic there are still some areas that fall into the eye of the beholder.

I will praise the aesthetic of Lange, or the proportional perfection of the Speedy, but ultimately if the watch doesn't look and feel right when it's on your wrist, then it's a waste.

Have you tried a Seamaster on? You might like it...