/fa/ - Fashion

>>15638940
>Ecofascists are lost actually.
>n-no its -yYOU that lost haha see!
how original

>Ted K and Linkola were absolutely wrong
.t some american who has a heart attack over the thought of never having a cheese burger again
i bet you cried when antifa burnt the wendy's down lol

>More advanced technology leads to more wealthy society which brings more environmental care
except this hasn't happened

>Nowadays ecology is better than it was 50 years ago, and it's getting better. Can you imagine act on carbon emission 50 years ago? Today it's part of the government agenda.
now compare it to 500 years ago, ecology has been devastated since then.

>"returning to the basics" on the other hand is actually destroys the planet
>50 years ago is "returning to the basics"
lol what are you talking about.

>societies living like these environmentalists dream are considered primitive and primitive living can't bring society to prosperity. Why prosperity is crucial? Because when you all about surviving you don't give a shit about ecology. You would kill anything that provides meat and fur, chop down anything that can burn and make a shelter, you would do anything to stay alive and fed.
funny how the same thing has happened post industrialization all for the pursuit of comfier living

>People of the West now live in comfort, they are well fed and provided with every resource they need. And we have economy so sustained that we can talk about basic income. Thus we can focus on environment and put enormous amount of resources to make it better.
that sounds like some communist pipe dream

>The biggest threat to ecology are the less advanced societies who built their economy on natural resources extraction
the biggest threat to ecology is industrialization and civilization

>So yeah, human progress is the actual key to saving the planet.
nope progress is a myth