/fa/ - Fashion

>>18150962
The Nautilus, because it's the most expensive one. I'd sell that ugly piece of shit immediately and buy a bunch of stainless steel Rolex.

I only care about Rolex, Cartier, Vacheron and Patek.
Everything else is irrelevant to me.

Explorer1 and OP are better than Datejust

>>17769527
The Submariner looks better than the GMT Master II. Always has.

>Rolex Datejust
>Rolex Explorer
>Rolex Submariner
>Rolex GMT Master II
>Patek Philippe World Timer
>Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar 3940
>Cartier Tank Cintree
>Jaeger Lecoultre Reverso
are the only watches that I care about.
Everything else SUCKS.

Vacheron should be kicked out of the holy trinity and be replaced by ROLEX
>REEEEEEEEEE ROLEX ISN'T HIGH HOROLOGY
Don't care. Vacheron has ZERO (0) iconic watches. Patek has 3, AP has 1 and Rolex has 5.
>REEEEEEEEEE VACHERON IS BETTER THAN PATEK
lmao no. Also Vacheron uses 3rd party movement.
>REEEEEEEEEE AUDEMARS PIGUET SHOULD BE KICKED OUT, NOT VACHERON
AP is independent, like Patek and Rolex. Vacheron belongs to Richemont.

>walk into store to try some Patek
>see they're also selling Vacheron, JLC and Breguet
>immediately leave the store while saying out loud "THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS" and never come back
I refuse to be associated in any way with Swatch and Richemont groups.

>>17543205
They all are iconic for at least 3 of these 5 reasons
>you can recognize them in less than half a second
>they brought something new to the table (tech wise or design wise)
>they're popular icons
>they're best sellers
>they're the most discussed watches on social medias/Youtube/whatever
The only one that comes to my mind that deserves to be on that list is the Apple Watch.
Whether you like them or not isn't the point (I personally hate at least half of these).