/fa/ - Fashion

>>15929586
I don't own these but I've always thought Flightposite 2's as futuristic looking. Hyper Adapts are also pretty futuristic looking and have the tech to back it up.

>>15930817
>AM93's not cool
I'd disagree, they are decently cool especially for Air Max heads. I will concede a triple black pair is not so much, but in the OG Cactus color the silhouette is top 6 or 7 Air Max for sure (color waves aside). - Not to mention it was one of the first sneakers with a booty neoprene ankle portion that gave a nice snug fit (the first being the Huarache in '92). A sneaker component that is quite commonplace today.

>Try something fucking new already these sneakers fucking suck
Alright I see now you have some form of retardation. Have you even worn a pair of AM95s?

You claiming that 93's were 'never cool' is blatantly false, Air Maxes were incredibly popular in when they came out in the 90s, you sound like a 14 year old kid who just started collecting yeezys last year and have no idea what you're talking about.

>these will age poorly but they look funky.
That's the point, they were $30 office beaters, the suede is already starting to age in that photo and they aged much more since that photo was taken. Aging is part of sneaker collecting/ownership, how new are you?

>because they're marketed for hispanics
Pic is literally a pair of Chinese New Year sneakers. How many Chinese hispanics do you know?