/fa/ - Fashion

>>13564984
s-sorry, me learn now

>>13482931
>No, boring as fuck.
GS is literally the most generic bullshit watch design ever, plain as shit case with a white face, it's like they took a shit ass Rolex like the Explorer and wrote Seiko on it.

>Marketing has made sure of that
Why does the reason something holds value matter?

>but when comparing the technical aspects of the watch then it is irrelevant.
>"I lost a whole heap of money on my GS but who cares it's technically better than a rolex"

>You mean worse movement.
No, you are retarded. The 3135 is as good as it gets in the real world, reliable and durable, hugely accurate, plenty power reserve and cheap maintenance costs relative to the price of the watch.

>Yes because they produce so many watches on their machines that they don't even know what to do with the parts. And you pay more for this? Lolkek.
Not sure how to even reply to something so retarded. You're arguing the GS is a better watch because replacement parts are harder to source?