/fa/ - Fashion

>>10370694

OMFG! Tudor are 1960s "imitation watches" that originally started out as a "poor man's Rolex" (and was known as the Poor Man's Rolex decades before Archie used the term). Even today, I only found ONE seller (in the largest shopping mall in the Southern Hemisphere) selling Tudor. They're tacky. They're essentially overpriced. And they' disgusting to look at. People look at it, assume it's a Rolex... then lean in close to read the name.... notice then that it says "TUDOR" and them chuckle because they know you couldn't afford a Rolex because why else would you be wearing a Tudor?

From AskMen-com.... [QUOTE]: "At first glance, Tudor is the perfect watch for the US market. The most popular ones are beefy sports watches that look best on FAT wrists."

Also: [QUOTE]: "Ironically, or perhaps fittingly, the people who seem to really be excited about Tudor are those who weren’t around when the brand failed the first time around. They’re the young hipsters buying up vintage Rolexes and wearing them on cheap nylon straps that go so well with their ironic T-shirts and facial hair. They love the fact that the old Tudors look like Rolexes but aren’t Rolexes, so when they wear them, they won’t look like all the other bearded hipsters with nylon-strapped Rolexes in the pub. Think they’ll be happy when the pudgy dude in Dockers in line at Starbucks is wearing a new Tudor?"

[Quote from Archie]: "Just don't talk about intermittent bearing FAILURES" !! - "Compared to Rolex they are amazing value".