/fa/ - Fashion

>>14100666

>>14043407
>Can be forgiven for that horrible 50s era high waist suited pants in the hotel scene.
Fuck you he looks good

Bottom line is - you have to be good looking for your clothes to look good

Yes, there is.

Clothing is about more than just being attractive to potential mates. If you just want mates then working on fitness is your #1.

Can you imagine a CEO rocking up to the board meeting on a $5 tshirt and jeans and telling them "I'm ugly so there's no point in wearing a suit"?

Even if you aren't into fashion for self expression or because you appreciate art, you need to at the very least be into it for the class and culture distinction.

>>13060291
The manlets fear the high rise.

i'm a big boi (lots of soy consumption, i grew thicc) and can never find jeans - is it worth it for me to tailor my size 32 levis? they fit me except i'm a 30, so the legs flare out at the top.. like pic related, but wider

i have an old pair of levi's from MIDDLE SCHOOL that are thinner material and i wore them a lot but they're like new... these are a lot tougher material so is it worth finding one?

REEEEE WE WOULDNT NEED ANY OF THIS TRASH IF MENS PANTS WERE JUST MADE WITH HIGH WAISTS.

Look at Connery's pants here, they sit at the waist. Coupled with the fact that his old school shirt probably goes to his crotch, thats a shirt thats staying tucked. But more than that, look how flattering and effay his silhouette is. Womens trousers are high waisted, why aren't mens?

>>12460248

Problem is the vast majority of brands are low waisted, only grandpa tier fits are high rise. Nothing for the younger man.

We'll proabably never reach this standard of tailoring again. Look at important people today and the super rich, they dress like shit.