/fa/ - Fashion

>>8839172
> really wild stuff as if that was a faux pas or s/t?
What?
Yeah, the old suiting was hardcore, the newer jackets are shit and flop around like a dilapidated dildo.

>three dimensional garment the like of which you've never seen before is that it can't be fully appreciated through the internet,
Sorry pal, I'm going to need to stop you there and ask you shove your privillage right back up your ass. Just because you're incompetent doesn't mean everyone else is incompetent.
MAYBE it won't be fully appreciated through the internet but when something from their professional lookbook comes out fitting like someone forgot where the pectoral girdle is, or even half of the back muscles I don't ask 'MAYBE IT'S BETTER IF I THROW 500EUROS AT IT FIRST?!?"

> representative of a bigger problem with people shitposting on here and elsewhere about MUH QUALITY MUH 'STHETICS etc
I don't know where you're going

>start of the thread but he was on the right path, it's hardly a good way to look at a designer's body of work through the lens of a particular 'core', intent on distilling it into one overarching concept.
No one insinuated that, OP wanted a discussion not a bunch of lame cunts.

Go to bed, you're drunk, and stupid.

The bottom would be something like this.