[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.12985208 [View]
File: 50 KB, 540x671, f6ba33eb8939d5d501f0a148930ee507.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12985208

>>12984558
Ethiopians are not Caucasian if that's what you're saying. Their traits evolved more independently from living in the high lands. They really don't have that much more European admixturegene wise than any other fm African and certainly not near as North Africans.
>she ugly
And lol ok.
Regardless I love your lack evidence to refute my post and how I should just agree with you. Facial symmetry is all that matters and certain features like a good jaw line are pretty much found in all attractive people. As for nose again, there is generally a size that is too big on any face to be attractive but that is a possibility whether you are white and it is pointed or black and it's more flat.And notnot all or even most Africans have giant flat noses the same way not,all whites like the girl in OP have giant Arched noses. There is a certain range of nose size and shape that can be attractive and all attractive humans have it. Get over yourself.
>>12985050
No chinese and Japanese do a lot of skin care (staying out of the sun and wanting heavy sunscreen) to ensure they stay pale. Thats why conpared to all majority pale skin countires, they have they lowest instance of skin cancer. Australia has one of the highest (part of the reason being Australians of Btitish decent really shouldn't be living there but whateves).
See me post about Ethiopeans. Even if they did have more European admixture, how would you refute my point seeing as they wouldn't be completely white yet more of them look better than more "pure whites" A nonsense term really as no race is pure not even the Scandanavians, we there was way too much migration and interaction for this to be possible genetically.
And I don't understand, are you saying calories in and calories out is hard or that fat accrpt

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]