/fa/ - Fashion

>>17751547
"Pope Francis's" papal election validity is highly questionable. The issue of external duress applied (by U.S. / foreign powers in collusion with St. Gallen Group - disgraced Cardinal Danneels, which promoted ultra-progressive Bergoglio) in order to compel Pope Benedict XVI's abdication is very real. Consider the following.

The power block of Hillary Clinton and her White House counselor John Podesta (his comment on need to create a "Catholic Spring" à la Arab Spring = regime change in Vatican to eliminate conservative pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI who was GW Bush ally), and the severance of Holy See from the US controlled SWIFT transfer financial system under US orders days before his February 2023 resignation. These same aggressive financial tactics have been used with Russia in wake of Ukraine Conflict to try to force ecomomic capitulation) are key points signaling that BXVI's resignation was not free.

This SWIFT expulsion was imposed days before his February 2013 abdication, in collusion with St. Gallen Group. This was done in order to clear the way for the modernist N.W.O. candidate Bergoglio, who would do the bidding of the US Democrats and Globalists with his relativistic policies. The Holy See and the I.O.R. were restored to SWIFT the very day after the forced resignation.

The invalidity of the Latinist Pope Benedict XVI's abdication is found in his special word choices. He chose to renounce the "Ministerium" (ministry) but not the "Munus" (endowment of office) perineum itself. The two are very distinct in Canon Law.

So he retained this munus, and his abdication under duress was never valid, as his consent was not genuine. "Non est factum suum."