/fa/ - Fashion

>>17710892
>Rolex feel the need to write entire wall of text about some fucking perpetual oysters and shit on the face.
>Really bad taste if you ask me, but it sells.
Rolex shouldn't do it either.

It seems like only the top level luxury brands can force themselves to limit dial text.
While I'm not a fan of the watch, overall, I appreciate that Omega was able to keep dial text to a minimum on their Heritage Seamaster 300 and put all the co-axial master chronometer nonsense on the back. (picrel. if you're the anon who posted this, I'm not sorry for stealing your image.)

>>17691866
I did consider the Trilogy Railmaster but not the normal Railmaster.

I picked the Seamaster 300 over the Trilogy Railmaster in part because I liked the movement in the Seamaster better. It has an independently adjustable hour hand which makes it a very handy travel watch. It's a feature I think should be on all non-date watches.