/fa/ - Fashion

>>7392126
yes
twkdshdw will be 4 everi1 (◡‿◡✿)

>>7246874
goddess bunny, a male dwarf, for rick owens circa 2001

>did lamy's 1987 men collection include bulbous adidas shoes and mesh tanks?

the video is no longer available but it did include precursors to his nun habits and running shorts, yes. the look, the feel, it was so similar to vicious.

>i also mentioned jewelry, sunglasses and legwarmers. these are not rick's style. didn't we have a quote from the man himself about rejecting accessories?

is that why he wears bracelets? he wears big socks and he's been photographed in sun glasses and carrying bags. stop while you're less behind m8.

>>7217436
well, there's not that much to women's vicious, that much is true; it's not an indictment of fashion or cultural reappropriation or much of anything else that's been suggested, it was just performance, little different than rick asking goddess bunny to model for him.

>>7217519
but none of us shitpost, so we aren't wasting space there. i've been acquainted with merz longer than you've been aware that i existed and we've had discussions that put my best /fa/ contributions to shame.

>>7217526
it was a pretty vapid comment tbh, the best thing you could have done was continued to lurk and to consider if your questions would have led to real discussion or if they were just more noise.

>>7217537
nice ass pull and i can appreciate that the dude bought it but you're full of shit. merz is a working professional and he dates fashion models and exchanges selfies with rick owens. i get that he's caustic and your feelings are a little bit hurt by how he was able to specifically target you and >>7217560 in spite of being anonymous internet posters because you're specifically the problem here, but you'll just have to get over it, as he's totally in the right to be worried about what's going to happen to unwoven if some of the more active shitposters on /fa/ have unrestrained access to it.

we already have posters from /fa/ there, and he's fully aware of that, and he doesn't mind. he's not going to ban anyone who is actually there to contribute or to learn, but i don't blame him and don't have a problem with him freely banning people who are there to shitpost, even if they disguise it with vague statements about how he can sure type a lot about nothing.

>>7217563
margiela tabis.

>>7027376
i'm not pulling this out of my ass btw, it's corroborated with people who are connected with his inner circle, who confirm that rick doesn't mind what happens to his work once he's released it to the market; he understands that it's futile, even if he wanted to, to dictate who can wear his work and what it can be worn with, and it strokes his ego a little bit to see that so many people find appeal in what he does.