/fa/ - Fashion

>>10206441
why should there be if women arent interested? Why force some artificial parity for no reason other than some misguided notion of "equality"

Demographics will never always be symmetrical and to try and force it is just asinine and insulting to the group you're funneling people who would otherwise be uninterested.

CS is a very open profession, in that if you know your shit, you can easily get in. Its probably one of the most meritocratic positions in the world with its low barriers of entry. The women who don't join these feminism shits go through the CS program just fine, get a degree, and start businesses or join some. Should Biosciences have "men need to be in Biochemistry, men NEED to be in biology" because its female dominated?

should there be "men NEED to go to college" because college is female dominated?

what would that accomplish?

>>7355906
woops, thought you asked for the shoes

I'm going out on a date on about 2-3 hours.

I'm shitting my pants. Halp.

>>7271000
>then why do you even post that fit and look for approval here?

Because it's fun to see if /fa/ likes my fit. I've gotten useful feedback here before.