/fa/ - Fashion

>>17740533
please eat your laundry detergent pods and wash it down with a tall glass of bleach, I call this the kys challenge it is the kewl new thing on tick tock

>>17740664
like I said earlier, these youngsters normally live in suburbs with no transport options other than a personal car, their "objection" to cars is not genuine and does not come from any sincere personal values. they are normally just mad that mommy and daddy won't buy them a car of their own (underage) and they "rebel" by screeching about boomers and NIMBYs on the internet. they don't have any original ideas of their own, certainly no personal objection to cars that would survive getting their own car to drive wherever and whenever they please. it's just a form of childish petulance. a bit like a child insisting that it is a vegan now because it has discovered that they can get a rise out of their parental units that way.

as soon as these zoomers get their car, they will become the average road raging karen, complaining online about cyclists who belong on the sidewalk (or preferably nowhere at all) and how militant eco-fascists are trying to take away their freedom. it's a superficially "nonpartisan" version of putting che guevara posters up everywhere (though I put "nonpartisan" in scare quotes because they will often bundle their rebellious anti-car persona together with a supposed hatred of "conservatives"). once they have their car they will say "oh, I used to be blah blah, but now I am grown up and so will you, see all MATURE people will eventually love cars", because, as I said earlier, they don't really have an issue with cars, they have an issue with an authority figure (their parents) not complying with their entitled feelings of deserving a car, it is no different from wearing a hot topic T shirt that says "fuck you mom and dad"