[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.17148289 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17148289

>>17148232
a regular Submariner for comparison

>> No.15871443 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15871443

>>15871439
Don't buy the Tudor GMT please. You will regret it.

>> No.15761498 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15761498

>>15761478
My wrists are 21 cm and rather wide instead of round and I find that most 36 mm watches look ridiculous on it. Explorer is a bit better then Datejust but still. (pic unrelated)

>> No.15626216 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15626216

>>15626179
7 inch is not enough to pull of most "large" watches. Also the heigt is retarded tall, get the BB58 instead. I have an 8 inch wrist and the heigt still stands out and is annoying on cuffs.

>> No.15453055 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15453055

>>15452172
please don't

>> No.15357417 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15357417

reminder to not buy slab sided watches

>> No.15336184 [View]
File: 1.17 MB, 3024x4032, Submariner vs Tudor GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15336184

>>15336169
real shame but I'm sure it'll get better

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]