/fa/ - Fashion

>>9722529

I'm speaking of logic in the most basic sense. I realize epistemic skeptics like deconstructionists would call to question the premise of logic but, in general: inductive, abductive and deductive reasoning have been the universal tools of logic. If, we can agree 1+1=2, then we can agree on inductive reasoning.

Semantics I'm speaking of in the abstract: word meaning and usage, which is exactly what our conversation boils down to.

You seem to equate atheism with the dismissal of an arbitrary proposition, I equate it with a declared knowledge of God's non-existence. Therein lies the conflict, our fundamental ideas aren't different, we just defining words different. It's pretty trivial.