/fa/ - Fashion

>>15514659
>get called out as a fetishist
>immediately chimp out
Who's the frightened one here?

Trannies can't even save themselves from suiciding

escape me?

It's a sad state what all these trannies look like in 2020. You AGPs used to be pretty good in the past, what happened?

>>15043104
You can be all of those by just being androgynous, there is no need for the "trans" label, if for some reason you have to call yourself a woman and own it.
Let me tell you a bit about trans "women". They start off as a meek, lazy, self-centered excuse for a man. Because they lack the will to self-improve they think the grass is greener on the other side and that girls are admired and loved for simply existing. Transitioning looks like the easiest thing to do - no working out to build your body, no learning new skills to broaden your spirit, just pop a magical pill, follow a makeup tutorial and buy some cute clothing.
But it's far from that simple. Because once on "the other side" they need to compete with women. And they start off at a disadvantage - they don't have a vagina and they can't bear children, plus any masculine skeletal features they had carry over. And suddenly the grass doesn't look so green, pic related.
So what is the next thing to do to remain special? Why of course invent a new category. By labelling themselves as trans, they now only have to compete with fellow hons and ogres and get praise for being brave and breaking the gender norms as if that hasn't been a thing for ages. But that only works for their small circle. Functioning adults don't want to associate with special snowflakes.
The best confirmation for all of this is just how many of these fucks identify as trans-lesbians, it's a perfect test to rule out failed men among their ranks.

What kind of a stupid question is that? You don't use slide threads on a slow board, retard.