/fa/ - Fashion

>>13938583
>Watches are nothing but an investment
>I only care about brand recognition and people thinking I have money
>"Timeless" means decades ago they threw some shit at a wall to see what stuck, and have been making the same products ever since. They have actually made the lineup look worse over the years (maxicase etc)
>They have artificially bloated prices to two or three times what is reasonable for a tool for a professional
>Any time they decide to deviate from their normal lineup and introduce something new, we get utterly tasteless shit like the yachtmaster 2
>Have little to no hand finishing, even compared to competition at lower price points

I love spending nearly 10k for a dress watch with a fucking cyclops, with a completely undecorated movement, so that boomers will think I'm in their circle jerk secret club. Anyone who buys any Rolex other than a vintage tool watch should be shot.

>>13802420
While still nice, to me it just doesn't reach the levels of balance and aesthetics a MOTM or FOIS achieves.

Also why did Rolex ever change the font on the explorer, the vintage models look so much better it's not even funny