/fa/ - Fashion

>>7888838
Did you really mean to quote my post or >>7888819

either way here's my answer

I don't mind the vintage version of their sneakers, but I think as far as colors go, the vintage version is different enough that you should think twice about ordering one instead of the "all new" version. The tan-ish sole gives it a different vibe and might look better in some fits, as in you can stress it by matching something else with it.

as far as the model, the highs are slowly growing on me but really the mids look especially good (some brands make nice lows and awful mids that look like a mutated version of the lows). Not the case here.

>>7870940
>cp's
>no clean and sleek silhouette

what are you talking about

>>7462799
stop being pathetic
fucking hell
ironic/sarcastic shitposting is just as bad as actual shitposting

Recent cops, just got these