/fa/ - Fashion

>>15933601
>AM93's not cool
>I disagree
ok

>Alright I see now you have some form of retardation. Have you even worn a pair of AM95s?

Yes, overrated and poorly manufactured shoe. you are being overly aggressive to defend your own shoe, yet you havent critiqued mine or mentioned it because i made you that angry you felt the need to defend your tastes.

>You claiming that 93's were 'never cool' is blatantly false, Air Maxes were incredibly popular in when they came out in the 90s, you sound like a 14 year old kid who just started collecting yeezys last year and have no idea what you're talking about.

not 14 years old, i know what im talking about. i also never said what i was saying was factual, so i dont know why you're arguing like i'm proposing facts. they're all opinions, which is why the thread was made. i've never owned a pair of yeezy, or any sort of clothing associated with kanye west, and i never will. i have not owned a pair of adidas sneakers in over ten years. their quality control is on par with Vans.

>That's the point, they were $30 office beaters, the suede is already starting to age in that photo and they aged much more since that photo was taken. Aging is part of sneaker collecting/ownership, how new are you?

the suede is not starting to age from my perspective, i've owned a lot of suede sneakers and i know what aging of the material looks like. this looks like predisposed color fading for vintage toning, a popular fad with nu-retro sneaker fags like yourself.

>Pic is literally a pair of Chinese New Year sneakers. How many Chinese hispanics do you know?

chinese people will never wear a sneaker like this. you wouldnt understand the cultural contextualization unless you spent some time to live there, but chinese people do not walk the streets in chinese flag jumpsuits and find the marketing of traditional material to be very tasteless. they play with americans by producing excess amounts of inflatable foam fingers that feed the western ego.