/fa/ - Fashion

>>12836676
Show me where the Germans destroyed the artifacts of the Bourgeoisie like the Soviets did. They melted down some gates and a few village statues for bronze and copper at the end of the war when their supply lines were destroyed, but for their entire existence National Socialists were obsessed with preserving national art and the inheritance of the German people. Hence why they built huge bunkers to protect art from destruction, built billion Reichsmark museums to display National work, and commissioned an unprecedented amount of archivists, historians and archaeologists to uncover Germanic and European history and heritage, and even published stuff that made Krauts look like Snowniggers. Yes they seized art from Jews and placed them in bunkers during the war, but a large amount of the work they seized was of national importance and German heritage that had been bought by wealthy Jews during WW1 and the Weimar Republic, when the average German couldn't feed his family and was pawning everything they owned, including museum collections. The Soviets destroyed art to erase the nationalist and racial collective identity of their subjects. The Germans elevated their people's heritage and the expressions of their great philosophers and artists. You are clearly a communist so of course you will be disingenuous

>wouldn't last in National Socialism
He said he thinks it's pathetic that you want the state to seize everything you own, to do away with property and the seize the majority of the sweat of your own brow. That is the essence of communism. The state takes the majority of your product. National Socialists were closer to corporatism, they allowed free trade and individual liberty as long as it did not hurt the national interests. You clearly don't know the first thing about NatSoc.