/fa/ - Fashion

>>6650129

Even if you don't cycle, accounting for all this stuff will just give you a much better time of things. You have to do laundry less. You never worry about if your notebook, phone, computer, etc. are going to get ruined in the rain. Just physically *moving* is easier. Everything becomes clearer and more direct.

That last bit is getting into a certain aesthetic satisfaction. There's a huge conceptual and tactile difference between cosplaying in cotton distressed by the hands of dead Bangladeshis and wearing something you know is designed, engineered, and manufactured with thorough care to be the real deal and actually do something. And the thing it's designed to do is help you live your life and do stuff yourself.

Plus, you look like the badass you may become if you do the right stuff, and not like some douche who decided to buy an H&M M65 knockoff.

>>6646204
Look at outdoor brands. Pic related is a pair of Patagonia pants intended for climbing, nylon-elastene, $79.

Uniqlo doesn't have many pants that are tech beyond just being poly athletic shorts, but their aesthetic is very compatible with tech. The only cargos you might see more in 'net tech fit pics than the Levis Commuters (one option for you) are the Uniqlo ones, and a lot of their stuff is produced with an elastic waistband, the directness and simplicity of which lines up with it well, I think. The only pair I own are a pair of elastic-and-built-in-nylon-belt cords, which are okay quality but have a nice cut.

If you're not concerned with *looking* tech-y, certainly in winter you can throw whatever thermals you want under whatever pants you want.

You can also always look used.