/fa/ - Fashion

>>13727865
spare your feet the pain and grab some flyers instead, they have an actual insole.

PF flyers are the better choice.

they have more variety in terms of style and color, and they have an actual sole so you can wear them for more than 20 minutes.

The Made in the USA line of flyers is expensive but super fucking nice; luckily the base model center hi/lo is leaps and bounds ahead of even the 70s converse in terms of build quality and comfort.

I think the beefier silhouette looks better than the dainty clown shoe aesthetic.

just wear them until they break in and get dirtied up

converse and PF flyers will both look like shit when they're brand new; it just doesn't look right if you picked the black white colorway.

you made a good purchase tho, I love mine because they're cheaper and better quality than even the 70s

>>11966047
Chucks have nothing on PF Flyers in terms of quality, the nice part being that if you buy their base model shoe, you still get the extra quality missing in the base model chucks.

I'd even go as far as to say that the 70s don't even match the quality level of the basic canvas center hi's.

PF flyers also has higher quality options and more variety. you can get all leather, partial leather, etc etc. vastly superior colorways

>>11834105
>that black stripe down the side
fuckin A-1.

I like how there's a pretty solid variety of colorways with PF.

better converse coming through

PF flyers ya fuckin plebs

Thrifted a pair of white high tops yesterday for 10$, just wondering everyones thoughts

what do you guys think of PF Flyers?