/fa/ - Fashion

>>14476322
o shit really? i need to buy some Mugler Cologne before they ruin it with reformulation

>come back to /fa/ after 4 1/2 years
>waywts are shit
>recent cops are sit
>fatties everywhere
>literally no good or interesting threads
>no humour

what went wrong?

>>9206671
lmfao god no

got a pair of these and they are plaster

OP try qlo or levi's or some pacsun junk

>>8737024
damn

>>8713070
>>8713099
>posting a promotional video from the brand itself to prove that they're natural

just read the fucking labels on their products, and if you can't do that, look for documentaries on so called "natural brands". I guarantee you their stuff isn't natural and contains nasty shit in it. Not just "chemicals", but shit that's actually seriously believed to be harmful.

If you want natural products, you have to make them yourself. It's easy for some products, harder for others. But Lush sure as shit isn't natural.

>>8713239
Accutate is efficient for severe cases, otherwise it does more harm than good. Don't make my word for it, look it up.

>Laroche Posay
>recommanded by dermatologists
You're right when you say they're recommended by dermatologists, but again if you read the list of ingredients and google each one, I guarantee you'll find stuff that is known to be either too harsh or potentially dangerous for your health on the long term. Again, they'll sell you their products as though they're natural (though not as much as Lush does), but they aren't really that way.

I say this, Ive been using some of their products and other similar brands with a good reputation based on what dermatologists say, hell I still do to this day. But the labels never lie...

>>8713223
Some more than others though. Usually the more they boast about how natural and fresh they are, the further from that the products actually are.

>tfw hawaii
>can't wear siq windbreaker or anorak

>>8605237
>everyone draped in black

My niggas is this a Death Eater meeting? Y'all trying to find the Potter boy?

>>8553289
w2c WHY 2 cop?