/fa/ - Fashion

>>13857225
Well, I have never seen non-cartesian lcd displays, the most that was done there are the non-standard shapes that denoce "Mon", "Tue", etc. One could for example, instead of having square pixels simply make it a tesselation of triangles, hexagons, or even any combination.
Truly interesting designs could arise and there could be a wealth of animations as well, just think - it could be like a living, breathing font winding on your watch face without having the hassles that the modern smartshit watches bring.
That said, industrial design like on this Garmin in the picture I appended really does speak to me.
But damn, over 1000€ for a watch and all those unnecessary functions.
They would only truly be useful if they were capable of actually replacing or significantly enhancing the experience with my mobile telephone.
But assuming that battery tech gets better - is it safe to think that watches might in some capacity replace phones?
Will it be integrated there for those that don't play games and don't type up messages? Heck, it might all be voicemessages or voice-to-text in a few years already, the software is making leaps.
I guess that will truly be the new era of what was previously ever more coplex mechanical watches.
Old swiss man btfo.

>>13857265
>suunto?
I guess it's the huge glass look, right?
I don't like it that much either, in fact, the Nixon Unit SS Silver really struck a chord for me, but the display is too dim, and I can't justify buying a watch that I can't read well - the time is the primary purpose of the watch, no matter how you twist and turn it.

>mostly older digitals, everyone does that
Whoe the heck asked for it? It ruins what could have been a nice, simple aesthetic, reeee.