/fa/ - Fashion

>>18085098
>The old movement was not hackable.
And that's exactly why it's more interesting. Was the 321 hackable when it landed on the moon? No. You don't need this watch to hack. The modern Moonwatch is an homage to the vintage piece of shit that was the Moonwatch. It's a leaky, inaccurate manual wound non hacking bastard. You have to understand this watch or you will regret it.

>>18085099
Again, slow the fuck down. You haven't researched at all. That "box" looks like the old one to fool people like you into thinking it's the same deal. Here is the difference between them. Now tell me which watch says "vintage homage" better between the two.

>first watch should be new
Totally the opposite. You need a fine used piece to get into the hobby.