/fa/ - Fashion

>>17953567
I think you can see them here, the micro scratches. The bracelet is much more prone to them.
And let's be real, after daily wearing it for years, every watch will look used, but the problem with any GS is that, if you send it in for re-polishing, they will absolutely Not use zaratsu to re-polish it. So yeah, I guess longterm GS isn't the best choice.

>>17927328
These two things that you mentioned keep this watch from being perfect. It's not a thick watch by any means, but I know they can do better, I mean credor exists so- I guess it could be 1mm thinner.
The bracelet though, well there is no sugarcoating it. Don't get me wrong, compared to "normal" watches at different price points (1000€-3000€) it's better of course. It's thicker, symmetrical, shinny, wider and it just "feels" better. But at that price proint, MSRP 9500$, this is riding a thin line of not being acceptable. I could forgive it if it had micro adjustment or a butterfly clasp (like my two other much cheaper watches, the credor and the black bay ceramic).
If the dial, the movement, the finishing, the case- are a 10, the bracelet is maybe a 6.
The lack of micro adjustment is what almost killed it for me, considering that watches at 300$ have them.