/fa/ - Fashion

>>6407721
>find picture you like on tumblr
>view the source/original poster (OC in my tumblr? hah!)
>browse that posters blog
>find picture you like repeat

this is what i do but i dont have a tumblr, i just use it for pics

I am of the opinion that you should not let trends be a major influence of your style, whether that be what you choose to wear or what you choose not to wear.

Honestly, I find it very strange how some people will pick a "style" that they cling onto based solely on that style's status within that individual's perceived social circle. In other words: people who dress on a basis that is influenced by other people.

Do you really not find any kind of aesthetic that you naturally gravitate to? That should be what you are looking for.
Once you find that foundation, that pillar that is the core of how you love dressing yourself, then you can start throwing in a few ounces of trendiness and a few touches of whatever is "in".

If more people dressed how they WANT to dress as opposed to how they think they SHOULD dress (for whatever motive ie: social status, presentability) then society would be a much better place. Honestly, this is because once you understand the sociological fundamentals of fashion, then you really have control over your style.

>>6307715
Yes but imo that ties more into "style"
it ties more into forfeiting from the game of fashion altogether

virtually every designer adds there own twist or signature to otherwise "neutral" garments
thats why cp's are popular, it's nice to have a break from higher end sneaks that usually have very distinctive styles (ccp drips, ro dunks)

to be fashionable one should have to be able to mix pieces from many different designers (each with its own signature style) and make cohesive fits
you would also have to always be bringing in new pieces into there wardrobe, to ensure that they are never behind, that they become "boring" and that they are always in the loop

that is my view of the matter. i usually reserve my taste for signature style in my shoes anyway, everything else is pretty unoffensive and basic for me

>>6193434
then i'd say you'd probably have personal experience with the same kind of women, i can understand now why you would assume things like that

i'm really shallow but i just don't care
i can be humanistic and whatever about a lot of things but not when it comes to who i'm fucking
sorry not sorry

>>6152315
post a fit