/fa/ - Fashion

>>15049789
I'm not saying any of that, my friend.
You seem to have misinterpreted my message. It is perfectly natural to feel attracted to a mature-looking woman. However, here's the thing: attraction is subjective, whereas beauty is objective. Allow me to elaborate.
You are naturally attracted to the woman who will breed you the healthiest babies. You are attracted to a woman with ample hips who will give birth with ease. There is nothing wrong with being a little coomer.
But to even imply that a slampig is more beautiful than an elegant woman that carries herself lightly on her feet, behaves modestly and properly and wears dignified clothes is confusing attraction with beauty. Beauty is 100% rational. Beauty is symmetry. Beauty is math. Beauty is objective. They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but we all know that's not true. Let's say you are in love with Tess Holiday; is she truly beautiful, or are you personally attracted to her?
You are correct, physical attraction is an innate instinct, and I don't preach otherwise. But you, as rational Man, must acknowledge that true beauty transcends this animalistic instinct. You, as logical Man, are acutely aware that an overweight woman who simply got lucky with fat distribution will hit the wall, and eventually that conveniently-located fat will merge into a curveless blob with its apex where her once seemingly slender waist used to be. You, as evolved Man, realize that beauty transcends body.

Also, for all of you calling me a fag and low-test, I am actually female (not male). If you feel as though this invalidates everything I wrote, please, feel free to let me know how beautiful your diabetes-ridden wife is.