/fa/ - Fashion

>>12467512
>>12467479
Sounds like you're the one being autistic, anon.
No one is discussing body image. Body image is semantic in nature.
You're assuming that body image = silhouette, and that effay = what is the most physically attractive. You're also assuming that your body image is universal, AKA the qualities that YOU define as uneffay (fat, round, short, squat, featureless, shapeless) are tied towards what is considered attractive. They aren't. Plenty of people can debate over whether or not a short or stocky girl is more attractive with varying reasons, but either way, its semantic. Silhouette is a different matter, it is the general outline of a garment or clothing. It is clothing attractiveness, and silhouette is there to emphasize that (the most common silhouette is the hourglass one).
We are talking about clothing, so how a silhouette is achieved using body type. Anon asked how to dress a short girl, I answered with proportions and paying attention to body type. You brought up the idea that having a certain body type dooms you from being effay. I used an example of a girl that has the qualities you see as unattractive (short, round, no waist) to discuss how playing with proportions in clothing can help a body type adhere to a common silhouette.
>when you're saying things like "An apple would also shine in adhering to a triangle sillouette" you have completely left the conversation.
More like you aren't understanding what I am saying.
>You are what you eat and exercise
Well yeah, no shit. Guess what, body type is literally a factor in this. What your body type is defines where you'll lose weight or gain weight first.