/fa/ - Fashion

>>15925136
>I think colour dials age badly, get boring quickly and are hard to wear with a lot of clothes.

Yeah but we're not talking about something pricey, like a $10-50 Casio, Swatch, Q&Q whatever shitter

>>15915012
>Spend $10k on a watch
>super divisive, half of people call you spoiled, quarter nitpick about specific choices, others totally oblivious
>fair chance it gets beaten up or stolen

OR
>Spend $10 on a watch
>Laugh when people point it out
>Amusing conversation piece if anyone notices
>Can always point out it was $10 for amusement
>Give zero shits if it gets knocked around
>No one will be pissed off or jealous you got it
>Some will admire

>>15906481
>>15906489
For me, it's the A700:
>better backlight
>better display
>6mm thick

>>15901283
>annual day date complication
>alarm chronograph
>6 mm thickness
>bests even Rolex superlative chronometer standards
>7+ years without servicing

Why haven't you taken the A700 pill yet?

>>15896206
*ahem*

Or get the milanese bracelet

>>15891225
A700 is slimmer, better backlight, better display

>>15828665
Can anything really compete with the suave sophistication of a Casio A700?

Slimmer than the F91W, with better backlight, hourly chime complication, day date with annual calendar complication and chronometer, it's truly based

>>15728856
>>15728853

yeah. I'll say the Casio A700, which is the f91w with a better display, better backlight, steel band, mineral glass and thinner, like $10 more.

Basically they're so cheap everyone into watches knows it's based because no sane person would otherwise spend so little on a watch unless they were based and hiding their power levels.