/fa/ - Fashion

>>8454622
I doubt these >>8454589
are pinrolled, I might be wrong though.

By the way if all you've judging/taking cues from is that one picture, you shouldn't worry too much about how it looks on the internet : you'd need to see it from different angles to make sure it actually looks good. About a million things can be done to make any piece of clothing look good in pictures, but that doesn't mean the fit is going to be like that in real life.

With that said, it's certainly possible to get that kind of look on your jeans, but you'd have to make sure that they aren't too long (>>8454684 these are too long and the stacks don't look good), and you can have the leg opening of your jeans narrowed to whatever you please. Just make sure you don't ask for a 16cm opening if the general fit of the jeans is on the looser side, otherwise what you'll get is at best a carrot cut (wide/normal thighs and tapered calves), and in some cases something that looks like shit.

The safest thing, in my opinion, is to find jeans that have a leg opening of below 18cm, and at the narrowest 16.5 or something similar. 17.5 or 17 is my personal favorite, allows you to wear them with different kinds of shoes even if you have big feet (11us here), it won't look weird, and it has the most natural fit in the bottom part of the jeans.

pic related, although I'm not sure I got the filename right...