/fa/ - Fashion

>>12438331
I know it's not a gorka per se, but it looks gorka inspired!

>/fa/ What are your thoughts on this exceptional style?

>>11486704

Probably due to the fact that the resurgence of the 80s cyberpunk style and it's association with designers like Errolson Hugh, or the techwear movement as a whole. The aesthetic of both kind of go hand in hand.

It's not really about 'expensive anoraks', in fact, 'anorak' would be a poor way to describe what most of the offerings in techwear are. It's functionality brought in tandem with style, that style often being futurism. Just look at the Acronym promotional videos(e.g. "The Cut"), they really market themselves as striving for that kind of aesthetic.

>>11043936
Rick Ownes is a fashion designer.

Anyway whats your price range? How much are you willing to invest. If you have a ton of money to invest on this and you want top quality techwear buy Acronym.

If you're poor buy minimalist black Northface outwear, black cargopants from your local military surplus and black or white sneakers.

If you want to fit in at all costs: some nice white sneakers of your choice that you can also parkour comfortably with, levis skinny jeans, a t-shirt and a jacket with lots of pockets.

Do you need any protection? Then try what Varg Virkenes used to do when he was paranoid that someday he would get stabbed by Euronymous:

tee > chain mail > sweatshirt (any outwear does). Look at the types of light protection that was worn in the past. Watch videos about chain mail armor & Gamberson.

>>10496516

>>8390572
>Can't read or doesn't know what pseudo-intellect means

Just my observations, man. I don't like most techninja fits with normal skinny pants. I feel they'd be more appropriate as slim-ish technical chinos in a casual fit. Also not trying to bash OP, there's gotta be some people to give criticism that doesn't include LOLimageedits.