/fa/ - Fashion

>>15559074
Sorry for the delay, anon, been busy. It's a Seiko SARX035. Pretty damn expensive for a Seiko, but they really do put a lot of effort into the finish and materials. If you're okay sacrificing movement to stay under $1,000 then it's a good watch. The 6R15 is reliable enough.

S E I K O
A e S t H e T i C s

>>15555818
Not my cup of tea between the numerals at 12 and 6 and the dots on the far end of the indices. That being said it's pretty clean looking, if the dial and general design floats your boat, why not.

I like my dials like I like my coffee.

Good morning, /wt/.