/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1299708
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_precipitator

>I have researched this topic, but to no avail thanks to Googles search algorithms.

oh its all a conspiracy and shit

>>1299716
Conspiracy eh? Funny, I hear that nonsense a lot. Luckily, electricity is on my side and that can't be falsified! Thanks a lot for the name, I will resume digging into my already substantially deep rabbit hole.
Have a conspiracy, on the house.

>>1299723
wtf is your pic on about?

>>1299740
The five senses in your body is one of the systems of the advanced system of control that is implicated on us, because we were not taught from a young age what exactly we are and how our body completely functions, these senses are what drive our subconscious mind and in the case of most people, our waking life. Heres, the second system which controls our thoughts and actions, pic related.

>>1299751
YLYL?

>>1299755
Hey if thats what you see, go for it! Have another YLYL, I have lots of your taste!

>>1299708
Better have a filter on that water or you can get some nasty bacteria growing.

>>1299765
Thats what the cavitation is for, UHF filter is best filter

>>1299723
>>1299751
>>1299758
Wow this is some pretty crackpot tier shit OP.

Here have a non conspiracy on the house and remember that all your senses are a lie because you do not exist as a complete entity in the first place.

Also here's a multitude of solutions on a website that's right up your alley: https://www.frequencyrising.com/water_filtrationmethods.htm

>>1299873
Thank you for the diagram, its nice, I am very familiar with this concept. By saying we do not exist as a complete entity you are in fact supporting my conspiracy pix because thats exactly what I have displayed. Everything is an electrical signal whether you agree or not, the world is nothing more than a compilation of waveforms, all kinds of them, but nonetheless waveforms. Perceiving a sweet smell or the stiffness of a rock is a simple input/output function of your 5 senses (see 2nd pic) with your brain. The stiffness of a rock is just a lower frequency resonance of the waveform you are observing, while a gas is a higher frequency resonance of the waveform you are observing. Water resonates less frequently than steam. Energy is never lost, only transfered. Are you familiar with cymatics for example?

>>1299708
Sooooo those "singing bowls" don't work at all. And frequency won't get solids out of air. But they do use electrostatic filters for all sorts of shit. Everything from those Sharper Image air purifiers to the giant exhaust scrubbers on power plants.

>>1299887
Thank you, yeah the bowls do work, you just have to hold you hand steadily on the rim while going around the circumference of the bowl for long enough until the bubbles begin to implode because of the effect of cavitation. Check out what cavitation is and how it works, they use it in hydro-electric dams, it is when bubbles implode due to overwhelming pressure release inside an impeller.

>>1299884
>By saying we do not exist as a complete entity you are in fact supporting my conspiracy pix because thats exactly what I have displayed.

Wrong. Your images contain notions of secularized metaphysics, nano robots and other materialistic things. Everything is inertia and the loss of inertia expressed by:

>Everything is an electrical signal whether you agree or not, the world is nothing more than a compilation of waveforms, all kinds of them, but nonetheless waveforms.

yes

>Energy is never lost, only transfered.

yes

>cymatics

Spacial and counter-spacial and a wave is what something does not what something is. Dielectric inertia drives everything including magnetism.

>>1299902
Granted, I was mistaken to mix your explanation with my pix, it is a completely different subject. The more complex version of perception of those elements and waveforms, which I was merely using to get people to think about how to control oneself and understand that their subconscious and passive powers are being used against them (Whole different ball game there as well).

If the waveforms were to stop resonating, they would cease to exist (speaking philosophically), there is no evidence of a waveform not moving, from which you can deduct the following: everything we perceive is in fact a waveform, not simply what it does.

>>1299918
>Granted, I was mistaken to mix your explanation with my pix, it is a completely different subject

My bad, I'm just hyped/pissed off after having a "0 and 1" conversation on x, (chaos and the principle) and getting nowhere because some people just can't accept that 0 AND 1 are "not a number". Now that we're on the subject though,

>If the waveforms were to stop resonating, they would cease to exist

When I jump into a pool and start splashing around creating waves in the water with my hands am I creating something new called a "wave" or am I just moving what's already there?

>there is no evidence of a waveform not moving, from which you can deduct the following: everything we perceive is in fact a waveform, not simply what it does.

A waveform of what though? This is why you can't use deductive reasoning, rather abductive reasoning. You can deduce nothing from something that cannot be observed, you aren't even "complete" enough to make such an observation. If something cannot come from nothing, then the universe never began. If something cannot turn into nothing, then the universe will never end. So since this can only be defined as "incomplete" (and even that is incorrect), the only logical explination would be:

The universe is self-similar and holographic in nature. It derives only from itself in order to complete itself. Since it is not complete it does not exist as its own thing then;

Nothing can exist but change.

>>1299925
>Nothing can exist but change.

Is this not exactly what I said? A waveform will cease to exist if it becomes still? You playing around in a pool is a compilation of waveforms, like you verified in one of my earlier statements. You are a complex compilation of waveforms (human body), acting in a pool of water (moving waveforms around against eachother). We are literally having a debate and arguing the exact same principle, are you just looking for me to submit and say you are right? I can do that, you are right. Nothing can exist but change.

>>1299935
>Is this not exactly what I said?
Yes, but with the added
>A waveform will cease to exist if it becomes still?
No but it will turn into a different derivative of that wave.

>We are literally having a debate and arguing the exact same principle, are you just looking for me to submit and say you are right? I can do that, you are right. Nothing can exist but change.

We're on par with change and all that, where we differ is our belief in what a wave is/ what it does

A wave is what something does. You can call it a thing but that will just lead you around in a circle "It's an electromagnetic wave", "Oh what and why is it waving like that", "because the universe works on waves", "but what is a wave?". You cannot classify a wave as a noun in this case because it cannot be defined as something in and of itself, it is a posterior attribute to what we're observing, the "x".

I wave my hand

My hand makes the water wave

The water waves make the water molecules oxygen and hydrogen "wave" and so on and so on. There is no end. There is no x

This means that a "Wave" cannot be a thing in and of itself, because there is nothing there to give definition to. It in and of itself and it's actions are taking place and moving through a MEDIUM that is the noun which you seek to give "Definition", but this also cannot be given a definition because it never comes to completion. Why do you suppose the toroid is the shape it is?

Look up Eric Dollards work on Counter space and the Dielectric, mind bending stuff.

And Ken Wheeler is the final boss of Magnetism and Platonic Logic, the guy literally tattooed his arms with equations and some of his stuff will turn your world upside down. The problem is he has like 500 videos and can incredibly repetitive at some times .

And no the earth isn't flat. Lol.

>>1299950
>Is this not exactly what I said?
*Yes, but with the added notion that a wave is a noun rather than a verb in this case.

>>1299950
I see now very clearly that we are not talking about the same thing. A waveform is a resonating frequency. Not you just creating a wave in water. Your hand, the actual physical tissue is the electrical signal which I am saying is the waveform. All 'things' that you perceive in this 'world' are just a mixture of electrical signals/waveforms/frequencies. The only difference between say, your soft flesh and a hard piece of granite is that your hand resonates at a higher electrical frequency and the rock resonates at a lower electrical frequency. An electro-magnetic field is just another type of waveform in which that electricity moves around. All of what I am 'claiming' can be simply verified and tested with tools such as an oscilloscope. I am very much disregarding the classical definition of a 'wave', because it is simply not reality. An electrical signal is a noun and an electrical signal is a waveform (see oscilloscope). Lets not get into astrophysics please. Lets keep it basic to try and meet our understandings of what the most basic thing actually is. The atom is not real, there are no protons, no neutrons, no electrons, only moving electrical signals which behave like a 'wave' therefore I use the word waveform to describe the essence of our existence here on this land.

>>1299958
I'm a physicist and you are not correct. You see, your model has no predictive capabilities, which the model of the atom, and electrons, and waves and fields and forces does. The only reason your electrical signals can exist is because all atoms themselves have electrons and can produce a potential in conductive media, not to mention what holds matter together in the first place. Fundamental experiments such as Rutherford's gold foil and the oil drop have proven this and aligned with our theories. The properties of matter all fall into one neat puzzle with the rest of quantum physics, with few missing pieces. If you're going to produce theories which make no accurate predictions then there's no point in even saying anything. Experimentation is key to the modern scientific method.

>>1300034
Bullshit. Modern physics are a joke.
Today, the fact that Light can bend is no big secret. Optical fiber telephone cables bend light every day. But light bending in Outer Space without needing an optical lens to bend it… this was a revolutionary idea 100 years ago when Einstein’s predicted that it would happen . When his prediction of light bending around the moon was discovered to be actually true, the world of Science swallowed his completely fallacious explanation for it hook, line, and sinker. But then the troubles of Science began mounting. Once having swallowed Einstein’s clever deception, scientists began to find crucial flaws in almost all of his theories. Accepting his explanation that light curved around the moon due to gravitational attraction was their most serious blunder. What Science failed to note was the fact that the moon has very little mass, and has almost no gravity. Einstein’s explanation was a total scam right from the beginning of his being swept into the public eyes as some kind of phenomenal genius. The result of his swindling the entire scientific community with this clever stunt is that Science to this day still does not recognize, and will not admit that light does not go around objects because of any gravitational pull… it goes around objects in its path naturally; just like water naturally flows around stones in a shallow stream. And once having gone around the object, it resumes its original path naturally.

>>1299723
>>1299751

wow, someone's trying way too hard. those chakras are just a way for those indian mystics to talk about their attempts to see/affect subconscious body processes through meditation. as if the idea is even a good one in the first place. having subconscious (and non-conscious, for that matter) processes running in the background actually frees our minds to do those higher intellect things that make us human. going down actually heads towards an animal mind with more autistic traits.

and stop trying to make Tesla into some god. he had exceptional creativity and a savant ability to visualize ideas in his head, but one of the things he hated about Edison was Edison's inability to simply design using math and science like modern engineers do. Edison was mostly a trial and error hack with a legion of hacks working under him, but Tesla designed using the known math and science of his day.

>>1300041
>Optical fiber telephone cables bend light every day.

I hope you are a troll.

>>1300045
Why? Because you're willing to accept garbage science being shoveled down your throat? The fact is; modern science has still not managed to find out just what Mass actually is, and where it comes from. Science still does not know what Gravity actually is, where it comes from, how it works or why it works. Light does not bend due to any attractive force at all. In fact, the opposite is true. Light bends due to repulsive forces which make it try to avoid hitting anything directly in its path, not attractive forces. What Einstein and the rest of the Scientific world did not realize was that in order to see any light rays coming from the sun before the sun actually came out from behind the moon; was that this light had to first begin bending before it came around the moon… and then bend back around the moon, enough for photographs to show this curious phenomenon of sunlight emerging out from behind the moon before the sun actually came out from behind the moon.

>>1300048
light doesn't bend in fiber optic cables, it bounces from side to side all the way from one end to the other. you would know this if you had even tried to google the way fibre optic cable works, retard.

>>1300049
How is this contrary to anything I've said? Sunlight is not attracted-to anything which has gravity, in fact it does the exact opposite: it is repulsed by physical objects, not attracted to them, it just goes around them naturally, like flowing water goes around a stone. What is maddening about this is the state of denial that Science is in concerning this huge blunder.

>>1300055

other poster is right, you're either stupid or a troll. so how much pot have you smoked already this morning? or have you just stopped taking your Bipolar meds because you don't like the way it makes you feel?

This thread really crumbles my tinfoil

>>1300056
>call him an idiot because I disagree
>can't logically disprove any of his points
kek

>>1299708
What the fuck is wrong with a fan and a filter? Why unnecessarily complicate things?
The simplest solution is usually the best solution.

>>1299708
You can't just make matter magically disappear. If there is dust in your air, you cannot use electricity to just make it vanish. It has to be physically removed, taken from the air and put somewhere else.

>>1300034
>he only reason your electrical signals can exist is because all atoms themselves have electrons and can produce a potential in conductive media, not to mention what holds matter together in the first place

>An atom produces nothing, it is the perturbation of this "Atom" which transfers "electrons" which J.J. Thompson so adequately (but incorrectly) called "corpuscles" (not a particle).

>Experimentation is key to the modern scientific method.

Which is why you will have nothing to go on based on observations, you will never see "x" as it is not moving. Metaphysics and Physics are the same, they both rely on observations and observations alone.
>but math
A language and nothing more.

>>1300041

>Today, the fact that Light can bend is no big secret. Optical fiber telephone cables bend light every day.

Light is not even a thing in and of itself, much like a shadow is a privation of light and is not a thing in and of itself. If the privation of something does not exist then how can that thing have substance itself? You cannot differentiate light from what it is from what it does (illumination) because they are one in the same thing. Light is EMR. The speed of light is not a speed, it's a rate of induction of EM.

Why do you think light "slows down" when it enters glass and then speeds back up once it leaves? The glass is a DIELECTRIC CAPACITOR, not just an "electrical insulator".

>>1300044

>and stop trying to make Tesla into some god.

Telsa holds patents and contributed to the electrical grid you use today, Einstein holds a flawed postulate. Granted, a lot of both of their works were corrected by the true "god" of the time, Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Telsa technically did not even discover AC current or the AC motor first, that goes to Hippolyte Pixii. Granted he didn't understand the nature of his discovery, but he found it first none the less.

>>1300178
An atom produces nothing, it is the perturbation of this "Atom" which transfers "electrons" which J.J. Thompson so adequately (but incorrectly) called "corpuscles" (not a particle).

didn't mean to greentext this.

>>1299755
Lost already my dude

>>1300178
Tesla invented polyphase power transmission. Edison used it to kill elephants. Tesla used it to efficiently power a continent.

>>1300178
>that pic
what sized crystals am I supposed to use with this, and do they have to be JO crystals?

>>1300208
This is not a blueprint for a device and certainly not for "crystal power" bullshit. "Crystal power" and "New age" tye shit are just other forms of secularized metaphysics. This is a blueprint for a magnetic and dielectric field, an expression if you will.

>oh my god that almost looks like...

You don't say.

>>1300048
OP back here, I enjoy this thread thoroughly, it has been really funny reading all the responses of all the people to my information.
>Science still does not know what gravity is
Thats because science is a religion just as much as any other ludicrous belief system of a singular 'god'. Gravity does not exist, only the relationship between all other waveforms which I call density. Most things we perceive are more dense than air, therefore they do not fly around freely.

>>1300223
Wtf am I reading. Gravity does exist.

>>1300044
My pix are not about any indian mystics studying the subconscious mind. Those pix are meant to show you that the specific centers of the body are responsible for manufacturing those said hormones which control your life and your thoughts. Testosterone makes you want to breed, Cortisol is a hormone that ages your internal organs permanently because of the constant generation of those hormones (majority of humans do not know how to eat properly), melatonin is a hormone which is produced my your pancreas to induce drowsiness (particularly after a meal), seratonin is a hormone which provides a sense of 'happiness' (happiness without fulfillment cannot be true happiness). Studying one branch of the so called 'science' is not enough, you have to move on to chemistry and biology and psychology and philosophy to be able to blend together all of these principles to be able to produce any kind of breakthrough within one's mind.

>>1300224
Please exercise control because swearing will not provide you with comprehension of this world. I challenge you to study it yourself with your own tools at home, not under the 'guidance' of a professional study or work setting. Gravity as a force in itself cannot exist, because everything is merely an electrical waveform interacting with another electrical waveform. There is not another outside force acting on them.

>>1300223
Makes me happy to know that there are still people who aren't deluded with materialism.
>>1300224
Gravity by science has never even been explained so to say that it "exists" is wrong anyway because only its effects have been DESCRIBED not EXPLAINED as to what causes it in the first place.
>>1300230
yes sort of, but waves of what? Everything is fields and the interaction of fields/ "Waves" are seen on a small scale, but it is really the interaction of two field modalities that is initially started by one.

The dielectric is where the energy comes from and leaves, there are no waves in this just like there are no "waves" in a scalar "wave". Here there is CHARGE, and DISCHARGE. "positive/negative" is incorrect, there is no such thing as a "negative charge" and anyone that tells you this has no concept of what the dielectric field. Anyone that tells you that a "monopole" exists is also a complete moron that has no concept that such a thing CANNOT exist. The dielectric is a VOIDANCE, that is to say it is INERTIA and pure potential.
The "CONTAINER" of this energy if you will is MAGNETISM. Magnetism gives three dimensional to the world by storing the LOSS OF INERTIA coming from Dielectric.

Let's say out universe is a batch of concrete that has been mixing forever. If it stops being mixed then it will harden and "stop" and there can no longer be any movement. To move the concrete it must spin, HOWEVER it needs room to spin you can't have "just concrete" you need A VOIDANCE in order for the concrete to move. You can't just use "waves", there are no room for the waves. The only way to create this voidance is by not having "just concrete" and to use centrifugal force to express said voidance in which the concrete is constantly trying to fill. The concrete moves constantly but never "fills the bucket". You have concrete and the absence of concrete which you can now create waves in.

>>1300243
Likewise to you.

I cannot say that I will agree with your statements and claims. Simply for this reason: nothing cannot actually exist. You concrete example is a rather materialistic way of perceiving the subject, is it not? The concrete still resonates a frequency even if our eyes perceive it as being 'still'. Unfortunately we have not of evidence of stillness, yet. This world is a simulation similar to what you would see in a computer. The complexity can be rather tiresome to understand because there are just so many different waveforms ("things") inside of our world.

>You have concrete and the absence of concrete which you can now create waves in.
I believe my point eludes you as well. The blame is to be put on the english language as we all have different definitions of different concepts, lets try this: the proper way to describe it in the english language would be to use the term: electrical resonance = waveform = electrical/magnetic field. The idea of 'potential' is a philosophical term, unfortunately mixing this term into the understanding of physics is quite the heresy.

The most basic 'thing' that we can say exists, is the electrical signal which is described by some physicists/chemists as an orbital. Everything we perceive has a unique electrical resonance, this resonance forms itself into an orbital/field and plays with all other signals/orbitals/fields in its range of contact. If the bucket of concrete is 1000m away from you behind a stack of wooden pallets for example, your body/brain will not receive its electrical signal, therefore to you, it will not exist (Only the idea, the knowledge of it being there in your past remains).

>>1300254
>I cannot say that I will agree with your statements and claims. Simply for this reason: nothing cannot actually exist.
True, but also everything at once cannot exist either because then it would be complete and have no change. The concrete would not move.
>You concrete example is a rather materialistic way of perceiving the subject, is it not?

Not at all because to have material (concrete) you have to have to have the lack of material as well (voidance).

>Unfortunately we have not of evidence of stillness, yet.

True, but in order for something to move it has to have the space to do so.

>I believe my point eludes you as well. The blame is to be put on the english language as we all have different definitions of different concepts, lets try this: the proper way to describe it in the english language would be to use the term: electrical resonance = waveform = electrical/magnetic field. The idea of 'potential' is a philosophical term, unfortunately mixing this term into the understanding of physics is quite the heresy.

No I completely understand what you're saying, what I'm telling you is that to have a wave there has to be a difference in the first place, therefore a wave is a posterior attribute to the interaction of voidance and countervoidance. It is an expression of space and counterspace.

>>1300264
>True, but also everything at once cannot exist either because then it would be complete and have no change. The concrete would not move.
The concrete is always moving, because it is in fact an electrical signal. A wave exists always, nothing precedes it. There is no big bang prior to life, life/energy always was. (To our knowledge anyway, thinking otherwise is purely hypothetical and cannot be demonstrated).

>>1299708
Large quantity of giant crystals of salt and electricity

>>1300274
>The concrete is always moving, because it is in fact an electrical signal. A wave exists always, nothing precedes it.

A wave is a perturbation of the ether. The ether is not a wave.

>There is no big bang prior to life, life/energy always was. (To our knowledge anyway, thinking otherwise is purely hypothetical and cannot be demonstrated).
True

I don't think I can explain this any better but i'll try.

Say you were to mix a batch of concrete using oscillating waves only, The concrete would never be able to mix proper because there is nowhere for it to go! It would oscillate forever and never mix or mover around freely.

If you had a theoretical object that could not move, did not change and could not be destroyed, what would be the most effecient method would you use to incite infinite change to it? Since you have only the object you must add (something different) to incite a change into an inert "thing". The easiest and most efficient way is to add "motion". To keep it further in the parameters of not changing anything to it, you must use the easiest and straightforward way of motion that will incite as much change as possible. A simple spin, the slightest nudge, the mustard seed if you will, to the furthest point from the "center". Thinking in gears you get infinite momentum at the ends and infinite potential in the center. What keeps it from, flying apart is the voidance it creates, the edges are "Attracted" to the pressure difference created. "Never ending nor beggining" happens and because it is spinning and collapsing/regurgitating itself you get infinite change! You still get the "same object" with the added notion that the "anti object" is what is keeping it in a perpetual boundary of existing and not existing because it's never allowed to complete itself.
(1,1)
There is no "gravity" in the center of an object because it is INERT at the center. The "nothing" is there in a state of non existence because something in motion keeps it filling up!

>>1300332
And this is why the Greeks had no symbol or concept of "0", because they spent God knows how long trying to figure it out that everything must be EXPRESSED BY A RATIO.

>>1300332
I will try to explain my side a little clearer. I want you to try and simplify what I am struggling to relay to you.
I am not speaking of those things which you can perceive with your eyes, but those that require advanced technology to detect, i.e. oscilloscope or 'electron-microscope'. The most basic physical thing that we can say exists, is an electrical signal. There is nothing we have detected yet in this world other than this to exist, we have no physical verification of "space/counterspace". If we had the capability in our eyes to reach magnification levels of over 10,000,000x then you would clearly see the radiation of those electrical signals (waveforms) in action with other ones. The only real and true "potential or nothingness or stillness" which precedes that change/motion/waveform is your free will (opportunity of choice) to choose what you manifest into the physical world.
Electrical resonance (waveform) is not a product of the ether, it is what connects the ether for it to actually produce something that can be perceived by our senses.

This entire thread is pure fucking autism.

>>1300362
I struggle to see what this thread has to do with autism. Can you not comprehend what is being written?

>>1300352
>I am not speaking of those things which you can perceive with your eyes, but those that require advanced technology to detect, i.e. oscilloscope or 'electron-microscope'. The most basic physical thing that we can say exists, is an electrical signal. There is nothing we have detected yet in this world other than this to exist, we have no physical verification of "space/counterspace".

And I am not speaking of those things that could never detect what I'm talking about. They DESTROY the notion of what I'm talking about. Equipment is merely concepts we came up with and plugged "math" into. I will look for what you tell it to, but it will never show you the true picture. That is where philosophy comes in, but even that is based on observations alone.

>we have no physical verification of "space/counterspace".

pic related. The toroid and hyperbola and distortions and pressure mediation of them are what we know to exist, the form that is. When we zoom in, it's just the same thing in a different form. What we have been doing is mistaking these things as "magnetism" "electricity" "light" "gravity" and "radiation" when each of those things are the same thing expressed differently. In order for these shapes to move, THERE HAS TO BE SPACE FOR THEM TO MOVE. You can use "waves" to move them around, but for a wave to move it must have a space to propagate said movement. Electricity is not it's own thing, it is the interaction dielectric and magnetism.

http://amasci.com/elect/elefaq1.html#ae

To clarify "what electricity is".

>>1300362
>This entire thread is pure fucking Platonism.

FTFY. You think it's autism because you think we're dissing things that have no relevance to anything. Spoiler alert, nothing does. You're a hologram. Sorry you can't understand simple concepts that were discovered 1000's of years ago and put into practice merely hundreds of years ago.

Why do you supposed the FBI stole Tesla's works? Why do you suppose a crackpot that invented nothing is revered so well? It's because most of our scientists are doing the same thing. Bean counting, smashing "particles" together and expecting something "new" to come out of it, believing that nothing can come from something...

I would rather have "autism" than psychotic insanity.

>>1300370
>Electricity is not it's own thing, it is the interaction dielectric and magnetism.

I am saying electricity is everything, there is nothing else other than that to be found. The "things" we perceive are all different amplitudes and frequencies of the same electrical signals and that is why they appear to be different.

>>1299751
>SECRETion
How can someone not be severely injured from laughing at that

>>1300386
>I am saying electricity is everything

but that's wrong! define "electricity" and it's not;

>amplitudes and frequencies of the same electrical signals

electrical signals of what? Waves? Electricity?

How does it send signals of itself? Waves?

What are Waves? Electrical signals?

"Electricity is everything, it sends electrical signals called waves. Waves of what you might ask? Electricity! It sends itself for no reason and is what it does and what it is simultaneously".

It needs something else for it to have definition to begin with.

>>1300389
I'll give you that one

>>1300391
>but that's wrong!
That's fine, but if you believe that we are a simulation (matrix) then I challenge you to learn about binary. Electricity = Waveform = Electrical Signal, everything is electricity. The electric signals are only separated by frequency and amplitude differences.
If you are asking about where the electricity comes from then that is a whole different conversation, short answer: free will.

>>1300398
>That's fine, but if you believe that we are a simulation (matrix) then I challenge you to learn about binary

Holographic =/= simulation. Self similarly requires NO SOURCE other than ITSELF. Binary/simulations cannot yield a universe like this. How do you code a program that doesn't start? How do you code a program to end. Binary is another human contrivance of "calculating" and "numbering" things, such a concept is foreign to the universe. It is completely irrational and has no basis in reality.

>If you are asking about where the electricity comes from then that is a whole different conversation.

I'm NOT asking you, I'm TELLING you it is dielectric inertia and magnetism. This was discovered more than a hundred years ago and is why almost every wire has a rubber layer coating it.

>>1300403
I am merely disagreeing with your personal understanding, because dielectric inertia = nothingness/potential, and magnetism = electricity/waveforms. Its tough with the english language because many people from different upbringings and backgrounds encounter the knowledge through a varied assortment of 'words' that have convoluted meanings and definitions. Save to say, I blame our misunderstanding on the english language. Like seriously, what is this profit/prophet, their/there/they're, realize/real eyes/real lies? (Espionage, thats what!).

>>1299755
Kek

>>1300406
>I am merely disagreeing with your personal understanding, because dielectric inertia = nothingness/potential

There's no disagreement, that is correct,

>and magnetism = electricity/waveforms

That is wrong though, magnetism is an incommensurate field that is propagated by the dielectric. Electricity is a steadfast perturbation of magnetism and dielectric inertia, not a thing in and of itself.

That's why when a magnet "Splits" it's fields "divide". Even though the fields are different the dielectric inertia plane still exists in between the magnets, It's what causes magnets to "attract" and "repel" in the first place.

>>1299891
1. Cavitation doesn't happen in singing bowls.
2. Those are droplets not bubbles.
3. Cavitation is bad for machines because it causes pitting and excessive wear.
4. Cavitation does not purify water.

>>1300041
Light has a different speed in different media, this is no secret as it's what causes a prism or water to refract. This shows light's transverse wave properties as it obeys the law of reflection, which water waves also obey. The different speeds of light in different substances can be explained by different substances magnetic and electric permeabilities by the formula v = 1/√(e*u), which also change as a function of frequency. Optical fibres are cleverly made such that they have a higher index of refraction closer to the inside of the fibre, such that the light that reaches the outside of the fibre is refracted back towards the centre.

Light is not bent by the gravity itself of an object, but rather the object's mass changes the shape of spacetime independently from its gravitational pull. This is integral to general relativity, and the bending of spacetime equally explains time dilation near a gravity well. Time dilation itself has been measured simply by putting a very accurate clock aboard an aircraft and flying it at speed across the planet surface, so you can't claim that it doesn't exist.

Your idea that light returns to its original path has no grounds in reality, as you have obviously never thought about a multi or single slit diffraction, or the splitting of coloured light in a prism, or observing the spectral lines of hydrogen. All of these lines diverge.

Your blanket statement "scientists began to find crucial flaws in almost all of his theories" has no basis in reality and I would push you to produce even two of these flaws.

>>1300178
Math is not simply a language, it is a rulebook of essential truths; the equals sign binds two sides of an equation and allows us to make deductions about our observations in flawless logic, as opposed to a standard language that would simply describe them.

>>1300332
>ether
Hot garbage, that's what the Michelson interferometer was invented to disprove.

>>1300606
>Hot garbage, that's what the Michelson interferometer was invented to disprove.

Cool story, we invented a machine built to our parameters to DEDUCT something based on observations. You cannot deduct something that you cannot observe, nothing to deduce from. Even with machines you cannot observe what is happening, only what is happening AFTER it happens.
So the very idea that the Michelson interferometer disproved anything is hilarious because their assumption that the sun (or anything) is moving through the aether that was the incorrect assumption. You think that all actions must be quantified (quantity) and that is the problem. You have transverse and longitudinal components of light. The dielectric is a longitudinal, it has no transverse component, it cannot be quantified with a time component. Do you understand that?
Everything is fields and fields are not particles. You cannot quantify a field, a field has no quantity. Try it I dare you. Particles do nothing but balance equations out, they have no basis in reality.

The ether cannot be measured. We are not moving through it, we are completing it. There is no "Quantity" to anything. YOu can call it "inertia" as well since the word "ether" is like kryptonite to you bean counters.

>>1299751
Woke af tbqh. Where can I subscribe to your newsletter?

>>1300643
Here's a taste of the digging I have done, it's quite time consuming looking for information in such a controlled and restricted internet, especially lately. Good luck and be aware, trust yourself and only yourself to deduct the truth. Also please eat healthy. (End of video will help)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZwXnWUwjLg&t=2s

>>1300606
>Math is not simply a language, it is a rulebook of essential truths

Give me one example of something negative in nature.

>>1300639
>Cool story
Eh, semantics. It was invented and went on to disprove the aether as a medium for light waves.

>You cannot quantify a field
A field, vector or scalar, has an amplitude at any given co-ordinate. The idea of having a field without a specific value at any given point would carry no information, and hence describe nothing, unless you're implying that there's some sort of unit-vector field that only carries directional information, but I've seen nothing of the sort in the years I've been studying.

Particles such as the electron do have a basis in reality, that's what the oil drop experiment and Einstein's photoelectric effect proved. All of nuclear physics relies heavily on the existence of individual particles, especially the notion of Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions.

The whole reason for equations isn't to make us feel content that we can label things with numbers, it's that we can put two electrons 1m away from one another and our equation will tell us the force each electron feels, something that mirrors our observations.

>>1300657
Charge exists in both negative and positive charges. Hence why there isn't an incredibly large DC voltage between your hands. This also explains why you aren't a vortex of unstructured cations, unless you want to doubt the existence of charged particles in the first place. But there's a substantial field of electronics which relies on charged particles existing and on charges cancelling each other out, therefore there must be both positive and negative charges, regardless of whether you decide to call an electron positive or negative. And though it may also be a meaningless distinction, any vector with an opposite direction (be it a velocity vector or a field of some kind) to another will have a negative value relative to the other.

>>1300693
>Charge exists in both negative and positive charges.
The term negative implies that it withdraws itself from reality, electricity does not. It is a waveform which is always there and always moving, only reacting with other waveforms. You cannot show electricity actually taking away voltage or amperage when moving along a wire, only a device with an output such as a light bulb can do that by transforming the energy into heat/light.

>>1299708
isnt that how you make o3?

>>1300697
I am under the impression O3 comes from ultraviolet exposure, not ultra-high frequency resonance. But I am still a budding chemist.

>>1300693
>therefore there must be both positive and negative charges

Its not whether or not its positive or negative. It is whether or not it is on or off. You know binary? Just because it is OFF doesnt mean it is negative. Negative is a very interesting topic, its definition is misleading because its only theoretical and never practical. The only scenario, in reality, where negative and division work are in mathematics when your money goes into the bank. It only works in theory, it cannot be placed in a material sense. You cannot ever manifest negative cats. You will merely have a dead cat, or ashes of a cat. There will always be a transfer, never a disappearance, this is called /x/ or kabbalah.

>>1300699
You can also make it using an electrical arc.

>>1300696
>The term negative implies that it withdraws itself from reality
not in english it dosen't

>>1299708
yes. its called an electronic air cleaner. they have been used in homes for decades. they do produce some ozone though

This thread is making me dumber, please refrain yourselves from posting.

>>1300693
>Eh, semantics. It was invented and went on to disprove the aether as a medium for light waves.

ah see there you go, as a MEDIUM.

>A field, vector or scalar, has an amplitude at any given co-ordinate.
I'm not talking about it's magnitude or amplitude. Those are descriptions, not explanations.
Where is the ORIGIN of said amplitude? You will never find it because it is incommensurate, it will not follow any "maths" you plug into it because the universe does not understand math.

>The idea of having a field without a specific value at any given point would carry no information, and hence describe nothing
"incommensurable" Does not mean it is not there. It means the measurement keep changing with NO COMMON MEASURE. It is "keeping up with itself" so to speak. forever seeking pressure mediation. It is SOMETHING affected BY the ABSENCE of ITSELF. It is not complete, therefore the sum of it's part is also "not complete". This is the only reason things "grow" from the derivatives of something else and then "shrink" into derivatives for something else. "It will exist" would be a more accurate term.

>articles such as the electron do have a basis in reality, that's what the oil drop experiment and Einstein's photoelectric effect proved.

Proved what? That the "electron" has "weight"? What is "weight" other than medium specific, vector specific, and all these other factors that basically say that "weight" is DEPENDENT on more than one variable. Did they do the test on a mountain? Did they do the test underwater? How vacuum sealed was the drop chamber? What is a vacuum? Can a true one exist?

You can break it down all you want to, it's all the same shit don't you get it? All you're doing is getting literally getting closer to NOTHING. The THING, AND the ABSENCE of the thing to ensure that you aren't left with:

1. JUST the THING(everything with no change)
2.JUST the ABSENCE of the THING (nothing)

>>1299708
Don't you mean the Ionic Breeze?

>>1300700
I'm not talking about binary, not about on or off or anything along those lines. I'm saying the concept of electricity relies on electric fields, the storage of energy in the separation of charges. Since there must be charges present for electricity to flow through a wire in the first place, and since a wire is (more or less) electrically neutral, there must be an equal number of positive to negative charges.

And again, predictive capabilities. V=IR tells me exactly the current I get when putting a resistor across a voltage source, and thus it describes reality. Same with any other physics equation. That's why engineers using calculations such as these don't always have their bridges break down.

A negative cat can in fact exist; a cat made from antimatter. Though making one would prove beyond the scope of human ambition I imagine for many centuries to come. Your concept that positive is existence and negative therefore cannot exist because there cannot be negative existence is flawed because positive does not refer to existence, it is not counting the numbers of something. It may be a meaningless distinction, but we use negative numbers, along with imaginary numbers, to count positive numbers of opposites of whatever we've normalised as being positive. For example in a Feynman diagram, an antiquark is shown as a positive quark moving backwards through time. Regardless of how counterintuitive this may seem, this abstraction has predictive capabilities, just like using imaginary numbers/phasors when calculating alternating current. There can be positive and negative existence, be it protons and electrons, matter and antimatter, or simply directional opposites, as far as the terms negative and positive refer to opposites. There must be opposites in the universe, and negative numbers are a natural expression of these opposites, independent of which way around they are.

>>1299708
powerplants here use an E-filter to filter out particles in the exhaust gases they produce.

its based on a corona discharge, two metal plates which have high voltage (50kv) DC running through them which hit the particles making them stick to the negative side of the plates, this is then hit off with a hammer like machine and sucked away.

>>1300790
I'm a physics undergrad and I don't know a lot but I do know these people are mentally ill.

>>1300989
Welcome to 4chan! Please enjoy your stay (forever).

>>1300989
Brother.

>>1300920
Not the anon you're replying to
>A negative cat can in fact exist; a cat made from antimatter.

In your own words...

>positive does not refer to existence.

You're right, positive does not refer to "existence". So how can you then reify something else existing based on the "positive" not existing? How can you have an "anti-something", can you have an "anti-nothing" too? No you have SOMETHING and the ABSENCE of that "THING" at the same time that brings it into a state of nonexistence in the first place if you will.

It is written as "+' and "-" for language sake but in the end everything is CHARGE and DISCHARGE. When I fill a glass of water to the top, to take the water out I don't "add negative water", I take away the water that's there. When I make a circuit all I'm doing is making a small copper line where electricity wants to flow easier. It's not a "negative charge" it's a place where there is "less electricity" therefore the pressure equalizes and causes perturbations.

>It may be a meaningless distinction, but we use negative numbers, along with imaginary numbers, to count positive numbers of opposites of whatever we've normalised as being positive.

>And again, predictive capabilities. V=IR tells me exactly the current I get when putting a resistor across a voltage source, and thus it describes reality. Same with any other physics equation.

Again this is human contrived shit for human contrived shit. There is no "backwards" in "time". There is no "forwards" in "time". Time is a concept made by humans, it records and describes things. It does not have the ability to be a "thing" in and of itself. What is "time" in a cycle that never began. Therefore it can quantify nothing. How do you derive I by itself? R by itself? V by itself? All of these equations (including field equations) have this inconvenient thing called "time" involved at their roots.


>>1300989
>>1301131
"I don't have an argument so I'll act like a parrot."

>>1301364
Things like gravity and time are empirically provable. You're way too bogged down in semantics.

>>1301384
>inb4 tyrese drops the mic
Please, with testing apparatus show us where gravity and time exist. (A clock doesn't count)
Learn about the electro-atom friend.

>>1300041
When 4chan thinks they are capable of taking part in a scientific discussion

>>1301384
Then why have they not proved what causes then.
>we cannot reify something that doesn't exist, maybe this machine we built for reifying will reify something that doesn't exist.

>>1301396

This is their argument each time. "human built machines and units of measurement that humans use so it can prove things".

"For those who want some proof that physicists are human, the proof is in the idiocy of all the different units which they use for measuring energy."

"I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."

-Richard Feynman, the man who could not even define what a magnet is nor what it does.

This is their idol, their crackpot theorist who didn't even understand the nature of what he was dealing with. He promoted a psychosis of quantifying things that cannot be quantified. That's the exact same fucking things saying "we know the tooth fairy doesn't exist, but we're going to look for it anyway".

>>1301406
I agree whole-heartedly, while the real men who study numerous fields of specialty and combine them before blabbering away get punished and jailed for their lectures.
Live long friend and learn without bias!

>>1301409
you as well and here's a tip:

Invest in bismuth. In 20-40 years bismuth will change the technology of this world and help do away with this nonsense. It is the most diamagnetic element in the universe, its half-life compared to the "age of the universe" will paint a picture for you.

>>1301420
>its half-life compared to the "age of the universe" will paint a picture for you.

Unless you're using some version of the term "half-life" that I'm not familiar with, literally ANY stable isotope of ANY element will never decay, barring some as of yet unknown mechanism of subatomic decay that affects matter in general.

>>1299708
??
There are a lot of these devices on the market.
Ionic air filters

>>1301396
>drops mic
>mic falls
>ergo, gravity
You just dumb son.

>>1301364
You can have positive and negative somethings, but nothing is nothing, simply a term to describe the absence of positive or negative somethings. I'm not implying that the sum of a proton and an antiproton equals nothing, there is still a net "positive" energy because energy cannot be negative. To call energy positive when the negative is impossible is still useful however, especially when talking about chemistry and potential energy. Your potential energy can decrease, or a reaction can be endothermic, and the net gain of energy will be negative, but that's not to say that negative energy is flowing. This is where the idea of electrons and holes flowing through a semiconductor becomes slightly confusing, because it's not that a hole is the absence of an electron and therefore nothing, but it's the absence of the electron and the potential energy from the surrounding substrate that it carries with it. This makes a hole closer to a negative electron than it does to the absence of an electron.

If time is a human construction than the three common spacial dimensions are too. If you deconstruct everything we can measure to "human created garbage" then you're not making any more progress than stating "a dollar holds no real value". The rest of the world moves on without caring what you think. Mathematics describes reality, and so we use it such. Regardless of whether the universe actually obeys mathematical rules or if it all "just werks", these equations and rules are useful for us, because they have predictive capabilities.

>>1301384
Time is a funny one, but simply put it's a required explanation for our observations. But it's no more provable than distance or mass; it's a base unit or "dimension". Gravity is also required for our observations, but it's something that can be measured. The Cavendish experiment didn't "prove" gravity, but it gave strong proof for its existence. But it too is based off the base units.

Stop feeding the paranoid schizophrenics. Or fundamentalist baptist minds that didn't find Jesus before their mind required a "why are we here" story.

>>1301406
>"I can't explain magnets in terms of something you're more familiar with because I don't understand magnets in terms of something you're more familiar with"
is the quote you're referring to, which is completely correct. The magnetic force is something that exists, and can be described in terms of Maxwell's equations (with which Feynman is certainly familiar with) but to compare them to any other force that a person can intuitively understand, like a rubber band or the support force from sitting on a chair, would require explaining how those forces work, which once again comes back to the electromagnetic forces which causes the magnetic attraction and repulsion in the first place. In the same interview he does mention that it's because the electrons around the iron atoms hall have coincident spin, and this causes a magnetic field, but to explain why that causes a magnetic field for the interviewer, a non-physicist, would not be possible if he was to do so in terms of things the guy already knew. The point of his answer was to illustrate how when answering a "why" question you have to know what knowledge to take for granted.

His quote about quantum physics was referring to both that it was counter-intuitive and immensely complex in nature such that nobody could completely explain why it works; hence why we're still looking for a grand unified theory to this day. Hint: "quantum gravity" goes nowhere. https://motls.blogspot.com

>>1301425
Bismuth isn't actually stable, but it does have a very very long half-life, so much so that there's no problem in using it in medicines. But if I'm to believe that no alloys with a lower magnetic permeability will ever emerge the same way that alloys and substances with stupidly high permeabilities and permittivities have emerged, I'd have waited a little longer before investing. For example, as room temperature superconductors get closer to reality (permeability = 0) bismuth will become a thing of the past.

>>1301482
Cant distinguish that from a linear acceleration.

TFW one cannot truly understand a thing until he recieves it directly through his input senses; The idea is merely the body trying to mimic the composition of the waveform, but it is sparking in futility.

TFW the ranks of these such as OP are damned from birth by their overactive D2 receptors which are like mindless Dandellions, taking hold wherever their seeds may be found, likely on infertile soil where they will only wither. Grow, they are sure to, but their fate is sealed already. They know not anything else, only their own way of interpreting these inputs.

It is true that those who take hallucinagenics, psychoatives, and mind-altering substances will recieve a new view on life. This is true, you force your configuration system, that which creates something from only pieces, like a small child building a puzzle. The pieces are only random arrays of colors and they can be shaped any which way to create more than one image. But there is only one child amongst yee, you are fools of yourselves, for you believe there is only you. But force yourself upon that which alter your child and you will see. There is no you, you can be any child. You are free and not locked in your fruitless toil.

I know of you. I have been among your ranks. I have puzzled together in the same ways. I have used your child, but only for passing moments. I forced myself to flood myself with dopamine, to go among those that seek always puzzles. I know you. But you do not know yourselves. For I am not one of you. My receptors are underactive. My child is colorblind. I have been blind and I have seen and then I have been blind again! I say to you, you are the true blind here.

Nothing is true. Bow your heads, for you are unenlightened.

>>1301595
>Child rapist
>Drug Addict
>Probably meat-eater
Please go back to /b/

>>1301611
I practice the age-old practice of celibacy and semen retention, never have I ever raped a child, nor even put my penis inside another orifus. Drugs are temporary, never long-term. I was born a vegetarian and I lived one for two decades, then I became a devourer of the earthly flesh, for it was replenishing.

Be gone, coward.

>>1301550
No he jib jabbed around, started talking about some lady falling on ice and in general could not come up with a straight answer.

>but to explain why that causes a magnetic field for the interviewer, a non-physicist, would not be possible if he was to do so in terms of things the guy already knew. The point of his answer was to illustrate how when answering a "why" question you have to know what knowledge to take for granted.

"Before I tell you what I know you must understand that you're too stupid to understand the ramblings and stuff we've made up to describe that I actually don't even know the answer the question"

It's one thing to not know the answer, it's another to pretend you know when you actually don't.

>For example, as room temperature superconductors get closer to reality (permeability = 0) bismuth will become a thing of the past.

A super conductor is a super insulator. Diamagnetism is counter-spacial by nature, magnetism is spacial. When the magnet is cooled it loses great deal of inter atomic magnetism and essentially becomes a "quasi object". That sounds like something QM would come up with but in sense that everything "real" has a magnetic field being ejected from it, then what gives "massiveness" to mass is magnetism. The two objects (track magnet) and cooled magnet acts as one object. The uncooled tracks dielectric inertia is "attracted" to the dielectric inertia of the cooled magnet, BUT because the cooled object has no magnetism, its needs are fulfilled by the magnetism of the tracks. That is why you can tilt it, spin it, turn it upside down, because its MAGNETISM has been INSULATED from EXPRESSING a COORDINATE. It is so inert that it just wants the magnetism of the tracks so it interlaces itself within the field of the track.

Exactly what I said here:
>>1300859
>>1301364

Only without the incoherent drug induced mess.

>>1301625
>Sold out to flesh
Try dry fasting and fruitarianism, if you want true knowledge and rejuvenation not possible with any other method of life. It will free you from any fears you have.

>>1301643
Dry fasting is GOAT, my man. Fructose though, no thank you Mr. Jobs.

>>1301644
I wish you all the best, but if you keep eating flesh you will be consumed in the harvesting.

>>1299708
Op, you and /pol are why the google ai thinks I need ads for schizophrenia meds.

>>1301654
Google has mutated their algorithms so no one can find anything that results in very low cost /diy/ solutions to seemingly eternal issues such as a free regenerative power source or a clean and free water filtration system in your home or a vehicle that does not require thousands of minute explosions fueled by natures depleting resources with throw-away parts, trying to get you off of the path. Here have a truth on the house, which is the reason why they overprice certain metals despite their obvious abundance.

>>1301658
>obvious abundance.
>literally rare earths

>>1301681
Please study in-depth where these materials are found and how much mass we actually pull out of the ground. Can you not comprehend the idea of stockpiling to raise price and withhold the truth from already tax-paying citizens?

>>1301629
>It's one thing to not know the answer, it's another to pretend you know when you actually don't.
I, a 2nd year physics student know exactly why magnets work. I still suck ass at calculating the magnetic vector potential though. You implying that Richard Feynman of all people doesn't know this is laughable at best. As I said when you weren't paying attention:
>In the same interview he does mention that it's because the electrons around the iron atoms hall have coincident spin, and this causes a magnetic field
He dances about the question a fuckton, but by no means does he not know the answer. The guy's a famous figure in the education of physics because he makes people ask hard questions about their own ideas, something that would be rather welcome in this thread.

>>1301658
>zinc and chromium
>unreactive
They're only semi-unreactive because of passivating oxide layers, the metals themselves are quite reactive, especially zinc.
>weight
Even assuming this is referring to density, both of these are far less dense than gold or silver or platinum, and even less dense than iron.
And all this "electrical density" is utter nonsense. How is this electrical density measured? Defined? How specifically is it meant to make household items better?

>>1301681
>rare earths
This term typically refers to lanthanides (and actinides I guess) but not to transition metals.

Truly, there is no one more conceited and pretentious than mildly schizophrenic retards with a "passion" for science/philosophy

>>1301702
>I, a 2nd year physics student know exactly why magnets work.
If you can EXPLAIN how a magnet works without using descriptions such as:
>I still suck ass at calculating the magnetic vector potential though.

Then I would truly be amazed as you would be the second person on earth to explain how a magnet works. (No I'm not kidding).

>In the same interview he does mention that it's because the electrons around the iron atoms hall have coincident spin, and this causes a magnetic field.

To bad that that is not what causes a magnetic field. Try again.

>>1301761
>Truly, there is no one more conceited and pretentious than mildly schizophrenic retards with a "passion" for science/philosophy

And the world is so filled to the brim with descriptions that sometimes people confuse them with explanations. Metaphysics and physics are the same thing.

>>1301706
Been a while so I guess i used the wrong term. I meant anything above iron because that is where elements become more rare.

>>1299723
Kek kys retarded faglord

>>1301629
Kek what a load of bullshit

>>1301886
Why are you so triggered? Life been hard lately?

>>1300221
Imagine being such a genetic fuckup that you can look at that imagine and convince yourself it holds some kind of meaning

>>1301888
Nice trips, too bad your post has no sustenance. I fucking dare you to try and tell me what a "Super conductor" is go ahead. I almost guarantee your going to end up self negating yourself trying to define simple terms like "wave" or "field".

>>1301977
Imagine being so stupid that you actually believe that the universe knows or cares what math is and makes up dozens of

FANTASY
MAGICAL
UNICORN
PARTICLES.

So how many universes are we up to now by the way? 10? 13? It doesn't matter because every single answer they give you is a flat out LIE because IT CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED. Let me repeat that shit in case you didn't understand. THERE IS NO COMPLETE UNIVERSE TO QUANTIFY. THE ANSWER IS THEREFORE NEITHER 1 OR 0 UNIVERSES.
See this famous picture right here? Einstein took it while he was VISITING the marconi RCA wireless station. That's right, he was not actually smart enough to work along side these geniuses that have gave you electricity and wireless communication. In fact, beside him is Charles Steinmetz, the man who corrected a shit load of both Einsteins(particularly E=MC^2) and Tesla's works (on the AC motor/generator). Edison was essentially like a boy burning ants with a lense and would just play with electricity for shits and giggles till he came up with something (don't take that wrong he still did a proper scientific approach).

Quantum mechanics = Unquantifiable mechanics= Tooth Fairy/Santa Clause mechanic=absolute insanity

You think that math and science can quantify things because there numbers being used, which is hilarious because the universe does not know what a number is. Seriously. It is really so simple that it comes down to;
Not a duality>Equalizing(note the "ing")Pressure mediation via something and the absence of that something (not two things, not even one thing).
VS.
Duality>It's a particle and a wave! (two things) A wave of what we don't know, maybe "electric waves" or "magnetic waves", what those waves are made of are...?

>>1302046
Holy shit, I can't possibly imagine talking so confidently about something I have no clue about.

This entire thread

>>1302128
An attempt at insulting the content or those involved in this thread has so far been made by those that have no idea what is being discussed, by actually making that attempt you have marked yourself as one who misunderstands or lacks the capacity to understand. If you were not one of those, the ideal situation for you would be to try and change the minds of those involved, because I am truly an open minded individual so take the opportunity and try to change/help a life.

>>1302287
Even granting your position is true, you have only replaced one sort of metaphysical nonsense with another. Nothing you have presented is useful for explaining or predicting observed phenomena. Your explanations are not useful because they have no way of being proven true.

You don't see this, and your stuff is crazy crystal woo woo bs, that's why we make fun if you amd call you schizophrenic.

>>1302302
Do you know specifically what I have contributed to this thread just by virtue of my response to you, or just by me involving myself in this topic? I am the OP, and everything I have mentioned myself can be proven through the use of technological assistance (precise measurement tools), if not through the verification of honest people. Nothing is metaphysical nonsense, this has time and time again proven to be an integrated part of physics, please learn about how the brain manifests its thoughts and decisions (literally gets burned, physically, in your brain due to electrical signals known as synapses). If there is a disbelief in your mind or heart to what I have said, then I challenge you to educate yourself to an extensive degree on how electricity functions (Not just theory on paper) but build some circuits large and small (I have taken electronics courses and I was an electrician by trade), take some measurements of said circuits and try different mediums of using that electrical energy, you will be pleasantly surprised that much of it has been lies. Not to mention, simply the act of 'going against the grain' is a touchy subject for most because of the intellectual complex and fear-mongering that has been used against skeptics for a number of decades now. There is nothing wrong or unintellectual about challenging the knowledge brought to us by our educational system (which has been time and time again shown to be incompetent, see for example transgender/sexual/species issues which have been pushing young children and teenagers to suicide rates never before seen in the world).

>>1302313
I think this guy >>1302302
was talking about me here :
>>1302046
>>1300859
>>1300370
>>1300332
>>1300264
>>1300243
>>1300178
>>1300221
and the naruto electrical chakura guy.
so i'll tripfag for now

>>1302302

>Even granting your position is true, you have only replaced one sort of metaphysical nonsense with another.
Everything is secularized metaphysics, whether you want to try and justify it isn't or not is is irrelevant because at the end of the day your defining something that can't be defined. An ouroboros if you will.
>Your explanations are not useful because they have no way of being proven true.
neither are yours and my explanations are useful because it explains how there is NOTHING there for you to observe. How do you observe nothing? You can't, you must deduce it using abductive reasoning alone.
>>1302313
>I have mentioned myself can be proven through the use of technological assistance (precise measurement tools), if not through the verification of honest people. Nothing is metaphysical nonsense,
Everything is Metaphysical, all you have are observations. Verification through others leads to group think, which is the biggest cancer on this earth and got us to where we are now. The proof is in your own statement:

>There is nothing wrong or unintellectual about challenging the knowledge brought to us by our educational system (which has been time and time again shown to be incompetent, see for example transgender/sexual/species issues which have been pushing young children and teenagers to suicide rates never before seen in the world).

True and this is because of DUALITIES. "You can be both sexes " "light is a particle and a wave"," two sides of the same coin" type of beliefs are brought to you by mislead and ill informed people who themselves learned it from other mislead and ill informed people.
"Wave particle duality" is the most hilarious three word phrase ever conjured up as none of the said things are an explanation to anything.

>>1302361
I do not believe in duality, there are no two truths to the one universal truth. Duality is an alchemical and hermetic principle of understanding because the truth is still elusive. There is only one universal truth, hense the adjective universal.
The problem with mankind as it stands now is the overwhelming amount of distrust everyone is experiencing because of the personal gain you can achieve by using the system of society and government as we have created. I am not concerned with any of this, I am speaking about the 'utopian' reality that everyone seems to think cannot be real, well it was real whether certain individuals choose to believe it or not. In that said 'utopia', everyone was an observer/skeptic/learner and an honest one at that. My viewpoint stems from these notions, I will believe anyone who has worthwhile evidence to bring forward, as long as I can retort if necessary. If you want that utopia back, live it, if you do not then you are clearly the problem. 'Groupthink' and similar expressions are only there to discredit the actual truth that can be discerned from the lies.
I am with you for the most part my friend, but do not give up on perfection of this world, no matter the state or appearance. Be healthy and live long.

>>1302370
>there are no two truths to the one universal truth
Is this a suggestion that we only have the illusion of chance/choice and that everything is in fact predetermined? This can't be proven or disproven, but assuming it is true doesn't really get us anywhere. Assuming it isn't true on the other hand lets us make statistical deductions about certain things, and under this assumption we can view fundamental things such as wave-particle duality which aren't governed by probability, but rather the choice of the observer. Of course the entire universe could be predetermined but still follow the expected statistical distributions and false observer-determined outcomes, but this doesn't really have any meaning if nothing could have happened any other way.

>>1302421
The only thing I have personally discovered is that free-will (opportunity of choice) is what we have. Once the choice has been made it is already a decision and is manifested in the world in some way, but prior to this it is still "potential" as some would like to call it. Disregarding all past and present circumstances, I am simply speaking of the actually occurrence of the ability to choose. You misunderstood my point in your greentext maybe, because it simply means that truth only has one common ground. Having two different people come out and name polarized characteristics of truth is only an opinion or a bias depending on what/who they are. One must always be willing to throw everything away in the quest for absolute truth regardless of how long it took the individual to study or attain that knowledge, especially regardless of the 'human' attachment to knowledge.
Beyond this, everything is an electrical resonance and it is differentiated by amplitude and frequency of that resonance. But like I mentioned before that resonance is manifest in anyway beginning from your brain (physically traceable/provable), it resembles free will (opportunity/chance/ability of choice).

>>1301779
>that is not what causes a magnetic field.
But that's exactly what Feynman was getting at. That if you assume someone pseudo-understands that a magnetic field is caused by moving electrical charges +everything before that, this explanation will suffice. But If not, you have to start from Maxwell's laws and build up from there. And I don't intuitively understand vector calculus enough to do that, but it's still not that difficult. But if you need to include answers to "why do the iron atoms align their spins" and "what causes magnetic permeability" the question gets a lot harder.

>>1302046
Perform the photoelectric effect experiment yourself, then look at light through a diffraction gradient. Find some other way to explain why light exhibits both particle and wave properties, the equipment shouldn't cost that much. Then do the same thing with the oil drop experiment and an electron diffraction gradient. This one might cost a little more. Or even just look at the original experimental data from someone doing the photoelectric effect, the simple fact is that the electrons were emitted only when the frequency of light was great enough, and didn't emit any when the frequency was below this threshold, regardless of the light intensity. The deduction Einstein made from this is that each electron particle can only interact with one packet of light at a time, hence why a bunch of lower energy light can't substitute for a single high energy light packet when reaching the energy required to eject an electron. And since there is a linear relationship between frequency and energy of each electron, the equation E=hf, the energy in each packet of light, falls out. This is some of the foundation of quantum mechanics, and it's entirely based on experimental results. We are standing on the shoulders of giants.

Again, it doesn't matter if the universe "knows" what a number is, all that matters is that numbers can and are used to accurately describe what happens within it.

>>1299708
The only thing purer than the air is my mother's pussy and yeah I swear she's a virgin and I'm the living embodiment of Christ have a nice day and happy birthday to me.

look at a bong and improve on an air compressor.
honestly, our bodies have built in air filters that run on electricity, bio mimicry it, you total and complete dweeb
huh huh
hhhhhh Owo
next step is to extract the air and store it in liquid form. then take a bath in it with a Lit cigarette, you flaming fag

>>1302370

>>1302427
I like these post, but I must digress that when you're talking about everything being

>everything is an electrical resonance and it is differentiated by amplitude and frequency of that resonance

you still have to have a cause to these observations.

>But like I mentioned before that resonance is manifest in anyway beginning from your brain (physically traceable/provable), it resembles free will (opportunity/chance/ability of choice).

But at what origin? Many have talked about the prime mover for centuries, but most of them have noted that this "ether" or "Center" of creation is something of tangibility, "something" that can be quantized. No, it is the absence of anything materialistic.

If I vacuum seal a tank and then release the valve, the air surrounding it will fill the void. It is not "pushed" into it by the atmosphere, it is equalizing the voidance of air. Same if I pressurize it. I took air from something(created a voidance of it), then filled the tank with more of that air than that said void. I release the tank and the air inside seeks the voidance of itself.

If I fill a glass full of water all I have is water which cannot move without spilling out(of the proverbial universe). If I empty it completely there is no water to move. If I fill it halfway full and spin it fast enough to form a VORTEX of water, I am creating a VOIDANCE in which the water perpetually "fills" the glass.

And that is your prime mover. A voidance of "something". This is the reason people have gone mad in the quest for "free energy", or created their own branch of metaphysics in an attempt to give meaning to something that CANNOT and will NEVER have "meaning". Humans giving a meaning to human contrived numbers and measurements, or humans giving a meaning to God it's all the exact same SHIT. God or the prime mover is not an entity that cares about materialistic shit like that, you are a mere blip in the incommensurable inertia.

gravity bong + magnets + gyroscope
improve your attitude and manner of posting before giving me (you)'s

>>1302446
There is energy in free space, but it would take energy to extract it. Just like it takes energy to run a fridge, or to pull a partial vacuum. What matters is extracting energy from across a potential, like a voltage gap, difference in temperature, in pressure, or in speed.

my name is op because my intellect is overpowered and I'm an operator
any body wishing to market this invention must first read basic economics by Thomas Sowell

>>1302287
Fuck you. You're sitting in your mom's basement philosophizing on what might be possible if science is ignored. This isnt truth. It is mental gymnastic.

now return to your shit flinging, peasants!

>>1302432
>Find some other way to explain why light exhibits both particle and wave properties

Again a wave is a verb. Try and define "wave" as a noun and you'll figure out what an "ouroboros" is. I've also explained to you that a "light" isn't an emission o anything. It is a perturbation. It is the maximum limit of propagation of any phenomena with transverse modalities (magnetism, dielectric, "light as a coaxial curcuit of these two modalities) with MEDIUM being dielectric inertia.

The higher the capacitance, the greater the electromagnetic retardation that occurs as light passes through a capacitor(glass). This phasing is the reason for white light diffraction through a prism and why shorter wavelengths are more diffracted then the red end spectrum of light. The coaxial curcuit (light) is mutually interdependent. Cancel dielectric compression then you cancel the "wavefront" (with a dielectric CAPACITOR ie glass) and therefore you cancel the compression or refraction through inertia (and get different colored light).

And there is no other conjured up explanation you're gonna give me that will tell me why light slows down in glass and then speeds up again. The coaxial circuit of inertia perturbations are impeded by the dielectric capacitor that is glaset. Nothing emits light, light is not a speed. Play with a slinky sometime and you'll understand what I'm talking about. The double slit is the same premise, the slit has more incoherent dielectric inertia within the contents of its mass which impedes the coherent dielectric inertia of light.

>But If not, you have to start from Maxwell's laws and build up from there.
>does not explain what causes a field
I'm disregarding the rest of your post because your talking about things that rely on the expression of time, which of course does not exist.

The only difference between a 5 watt light bulb and a 5 watt laser is THE COHERENCY OF SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY THERE CREATING PERTURBATIONS.

>>1302500
A wave?

>>1302501
that's water.

>>1302462
>Has not brought forth anything of value
Why are you so triggered? You act similar to a monkey shown a magic trick which is in fact a very fast method of slight of hand.
Try again.

>>1302461
>Supply and Demand are social constructs
Nothing to do with the how electricity behaves.

>>1302500
>The only difference between a 5 watt light bulb and a 5 watt laser is THE COHERENCY OF SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY THERE CREATING PERTURBATIONS
Your choice of words is a little bit off, coherency can be replaced with the word density. But essentially yes, the only difference between the two is just modulation in frequency. Very simple concept, everything we perceive in any way (visible or not) can be squeezed into this diagram.

>>1302566
>Your choice of words is a little bit off, coherency can be replaced with the word density.

No my choice of words is proper considering that density implies how much is in a particular space. Coherency in short is something straight and acting as one (bundle of sticks analogy). With coherency comes density. You can compress the wavelengths as much as you like, if they aren't acting as one coherent entity then the "waves" are just fall off with electromagnetic retardation and receive interference from other waves. The only way to induce coherency is voidance and spin.

>>1302500
>light slows down in glass and then speeds up again
>rely on the expression of time, which of course does not exist
Speed relies on the concept of time, but you say time doesn't exist.
Pick one.

And you still aren't explaining why light shows particle properties, or the results of the photoelectric effect experiment otherwise. And when it comes to things with mass, particles certainly do exist, that's what Rutherford's gold foil experiment proved. You see, physics isn't based on a series of ideas that we look for experiments to prove, but rather a series of experiments that we look to describe with theories.

>>1302287
>look at me, I can write an essay about how my theorycrafting isn't retarded while calling people who actually understand physics stupid

>>1302562
Fuck you. Butt plugs have more value than this discussion. Stop crapping up my board.

>>1302713
>>1302775
>Nothing but triggered children constantly complaining
It is interesting that you both claim to understand something, but there is absolutely no substantial evidence coming from either of you to support that fact. Modern 'science' truly is a hoax and a religious bandwagon, I wish you individuals all the best in finding the truth, although it will elude you for sometime that much is clear.

How the fuck did this thread go from simple healthy life solutions do TimeCube tier shizophrenia ? Gosh dammit, most of the stuttered, broken phrase forming/vocabullary is almost identical to the TimeCube grandpa, even on the diagrams. Are all american conspiracionists seriously this mentally ill ? There should be some serious study on the subject.

>>1302885
Fuck you. Your conclusions aren't based on evidence but schizophrenia, megalomania, and probably excess prescription drug abuse.

>>1302885
This is way off topic anon. Has nothing to do with Finnish whistle smithing.

>>1302885
This is you

>inb4 it's supposed to be as x approaches zero
Too lazy to fix it

>>1300034
>>1300044
>>1300045
>>1300056
>>1300060
>>1300362
>>1300389
>>1300790
>>1300989
>>1301405
>>1301530
>>1301611
>>1301654
>>1301761
>>1301886
>>1301888
>>1302046
>>1302127
>>1302128
>>1302302
>>1302713
>>1302775
>>1302913
>>1302932
>>1302934
>>1303316

All Big Oil shills trying to dismiss the truth, fuckin go go Power Singing Bowls !

Holy shit this whole thread is like one of those "science is a lie" emails I get weekly (whole physics department isn being targeted) thanks crackpot guy I really enjoyed reading your bullshit.

Just out of curiosity, what is your background, education and what kind of job do you have? I'm trying to form a picture of the kind of person that believes all this nonsense

>>1303337
100% someone who works in a field with zero connection to science. probably HR where they are used to having their opinions validated no matter how retarded.

>>1303337
>Just out of curiosity, what is your background, education and what kind of job do you have? I'm trying to form a picture of the kind of person that believes all this nonsense.

Oh just the kind where you have to listen to 20-30 other C grade parrots teach you the same crap that they were FORCED to learn. And after you're done listening to the parrots, you get to write a nice long essay called a dissertation that is read by the same said parrots, for the same said parrots to agree with. People like to think that getting a college education means that they're now "qualified" to do what they learned how to do when in reality, knowing people, having connections and common sense goes much further than than any education will bring you.

Lets start with you since you're so "educated". Try and differentiate a wave from what it is compared to what it does (not one person in this thread has done so). Paint me a picture of how confused the "educated" person really is and how someone can go so far without realizing that they're learning something no different than religion. Then we can move onto the word "field" and see how far your education has really brought you.

>>1303410
> I AM -THIS- MAD
wew lad

That chip on your shoulder is getting big enough to generate its own excessive gravitational pull

>>1303411
Something I would expect from a book learned moron, no arguments. Still waiting for the explanation on what a wave is bud, unless of course you WANT to make yourself look worse.
Also as I've said before, gravity does not exist as it's own modality, it is nothing other than dielectric acceleration. I know that such a statement rustles your bag full of magical particles which is why I patiently await you (proper) explanation of what gravity is.

I wish Cotton was a monkey.

>>1303410
>Try and differentiate a wave from what it is compared to what it does (not one person in this thread has done so).
Trying to disprove Time Cube """theory""" would be more productive, Gene has even put up a reward for doing so. Why don't you write a paper where you explain your breakthrough in clearly defined terms, instead of vague, indignant schizobabble?
Aww, is it because those evil academics are working together to keep down geniuses like yourself? Or because they are so stupid they would never understand anyway?

>>1303430
>Trying to disprove Time Cube """theory""" would be more productive.

Easy. Hypothesis based on the wrong assumptions, one of them being Gene's insane and psychotic notion that he is an omnipotent godlike being and therefore his theories cannot be questioned or reasoned against. Kinda like what you're doing right now.

>Why don't you write a paper where you explain your breakthrough in clearly defined terms, instead of vague, indignant schizobabble?
>And I'm the one who's "mad"

It's already been done you stupid person. Faraday said this and experimented with unifying light electricity and and magnetism (Faraday effect, maybe you've heard of it), and Maxwell improved upon it it further. So maybe you should go read some of the shit they published more than 150 years ago.

If the term you're confused about is "dielectric" then please sue the college that you came from. The only unclear, vague, schizobabble is assuming that there's dozens of little bb's with their own modalities controlling the world we live in like some sort of program. Pure materialism.

You still haven't explained to me what a wave is (or what it does).

>>1303410
Im the original guy who said that and it is the only post I made in here.

I'm not even going to get into an argument about science and or physics with you because you merely say that everything is a lie and then you start blabbing about all this pseudoscience. There is no point arguing with you because you are either so into this that you would never accept the truth or you are a troll.

I'm just wondering what people like you do all day long, as I said I get similar emails at least once a week because I work within a physics department and I always wondered who the people behind them are

>>1303456
>I'm not even going to get into an argument about science and or physics with you because you merely say that everything is a lie and then you start blabbing about all this pseudoscience.

I never said science is a lie, I said there is no difference between-meta physics and physics and that a wave is a privation of something else, both of which are true and nobody so far has proven otherwise. Both "science" and "religion" think matters are an "everything is two sides of a coin" when in reality we should be concerned about the silver in the damn coin.

So since you deal with "people like me" on a regular basis, maybe you can answer my question.

What is a Wave.

What is a Field.

Please just answer these two questions.

>>1303443
>gravity does not exist as it's own modality, it is nothing other than dielectric acceleration
There's some of that vague pretentious schizobabble.
>Hurr, through my halfbaked understanding of freshman physics I've gained an amazing new insight, uncovered a super simple truth of the universe that went totally unnoticed, because I'm just that much smarter than everyone else, and not brainwashed by academia!
This is you and a million other spastics before you.

>>1303470
>gravity does not exist as it's own modality, it is nothing other than dielectric acceleration
There's some of that vague pretentious schizobabble.

>He doesn't know that dielectric acceleration is and claims to know what he's talking about

How sad since all particle accelerators rely on coherent dielectric acceleration to smash said "particles" in the first place

>Hurr, through my halfbaked understanding of freshman physics I've gained an amazing new insight, uncovered a super simple truth of the universe that went totally unnoticed, because I'm just that much smarter than everyone else, and not brainwashed by academia!

So counter my statement. It shouldn't be hard since I'm so half baked.

>>1299765
Simply boiling it would work better. Most filters believe it or not aren't equipped with water sanitizer, they are actually made to filter out the stuff that many cities put in the water to sanitize it however you get that "bleach" (chlorine) taste and smell depending on the city's water source. These filters are meant to remove floride, chlorine, chemicals, not bacteria which when you look is actually much smaller scaled than most chemical particals. Boiling the water makes it sanitary because most bacteria is not heat resistant. Most. And some are even cold resistant but that's a different subject.

>>1303464
A wave is a spatially propagating change (disturbance/vibration) of a place- and time-dependent physical quantity

A field is a way to describe or assign a value (in physics generally of a physical property) to a position or point in space.


So now tell us something about yourself

>>1303520
>wave is a spatially propagating change (disturbance/vibration) of a place

So it is not a thing in and of itself correct?

>and time-dependent physical quantity

A quantity of what and how is it dependent on time?

>A field is a way to describe or assign a value (in physics generally of a physical property) to a position or point in space.

Now what causes a field? I'm not interested in how things are described, I'm interested in what causes them.

>So now tell us something about yourself

I like coffee.

>>1303492
>Claim that gravitational phenomena can be explained entirely in terms of other physics
>Provide no substantiation
>Counter that statement!
Gravity is not reducible to EM to my or anyone else's knowledge, except for you. Burden of proof, nigger

https://zeteticzen.wordpress.com/2017/06/15/gravity-does-not-exist-the-lorentz-contraction-conundrum/
LMAO. I'm guessing you're also the retard posting Time Cube tier drawings here
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=74655839&f=27&o=40

>>1303552
I'm not this guy but if you're referring to "MaliceMizer" then thank you very much for linking me this.

His words:

"We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field, matter.
A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field,
as measured BY its attribute, space.

To speak otherwise is like saying there is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light

Light,/EM , like magnetism itself, being a radiation, is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'.
We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'
where ε0 is the permittivity of space,
and μ0 is the permeability of space.
Since none of the four Maxwell’s equations is defined to be a causal relation,
and since each of these equations connects quantities simultaneous in time, none of these equations represents a causal relation.
That is, ∇ · D is not a consequence of ρ (and vice versa),∇ Å~E is not a consequence of ∂B/∂t (and vice versa),
and∇ Å~H is not a consequence of J + ∂D/∂t (and vice versa).

Thus, Maxwell’s equations, even though they are basic electromagnetic equations (since most electromagnetic relations as is Einstein's "p" are derivable from them), do not depict cause-and-effect relations between electromagnetic reactions and therefore do not account for much at all"
Ahahah. He's absolutely right and I'm going to now continue to read the rest of this thread and see just how many retards don't understand the difference between an explanation and a description. Equations are not explanations.

>>1303604
Sure, big boy, that diagram really shows you've got all the explanations and descriptions figured out. It's pure coincidence that it looks just like the doodles of a thousand other schizophrenics, because you're a special snowflake and not like them at all.

Incidentally, this MaliceMizer also claims to be an electrician. You guys must be soulmates or something. roflmao

Interestingly, time cube guy was an electrician too. Maybe this sort of delusion is the result of trying to push the theories they know and kinda' understand waaaay past the warranty.

I still haven't seen the OP make any testable claims that improve on those available via quantum theory, or at least any claims that don't include undefined babble like privation and voidance and dielectric acceleration.

A theory is only as good as its predictive power. OP hasn't provided any testable examples of his theory where it performs better than existing theories.

>completely wrong physics sent men to the moon
>completely wrong physics allows us to have relatavistic GPS satellites
>completely wrong physics builds us particle accelerators
>completely wrong physics enables us to detect two neutron stars colliding by their gravitational waves alone
>completely wrong physics forces us to learn completely wrong physics

Physics: it just werks.

>>1302913
>How the fuck did this thread go from simple healthy life solutions do TimeCube tier shizophrenia ?

fuck you, cunt. it's been a complete dogscrew since post 3. how could you not notice?

>>1303753
>Physics: it just werks.

This. Exactly this. What OPie doesn't get is that all this indoctoratetrination he whines about is actually the old fashioned school of hard knocks. People figured out what works by actually doing it, wrote it down, taught others. The people they taught now do things that look like magic to OPie because OPie is a handful of neurons short of being able to explain it to himself. And that's not even trying to be mean.

>>1303604
Maxwell's equations explain why a good conductor is shiny you dumb ass.

>>1303649
Absolute Butthurt.

>>1303753

>completely wrong physics sent men to the moon
it also lost the recordings of said expedition and "the technology to go back", ahahahaha.

>gravitational waves
Waves of what?
>gravity "waves"
What is gravity
>"Oh uhhh I dunno waves"

>completely wrong physics builds us particle accelerators
Humans build things idiot, there is first an IDEA then come the math.

>completely wrong physics allows us to have relativistic GPS satellites.
and they never have to be corrected because constants are always constant right!

>>1303749
>I don't know what simple terms like "voidance", "privation", and "dielectric" mean so instead of acknowledging my stupidity and researching such simple terms, I'm going to use appeal to authority arguments and make false comparisons.

>>1303908
Math cannot explain a field, they cannot be quantified. It is pure inertia (inert, voidance). Math quantifies things, but it is a posterior attribute. All it does is explain what it DOES over a period of time. NOT what it is.

>>1303966
>asking for testable hypotheses = appeal to authority

You only seem interested in vaguely arguing about semantics/interpretation. Still waiting for you to demonstrate that gravity is actually just electromagnetism. Is "burden of proof" a hard concept for you to understand?

>>1303966
I didn't say that you fuckwad.

Also news flash, no law of physics explains what anything is. It's all a description over time. You're using the fallacy of science and physics to fuel your own pseudo bullshit and rustle Jimmies.

hey guys, what's going on in this thread.

>>1299891
They don't "use" it in hydroelectric dams, it's an unwanted consequence of turbulent water interacting with a rapid spinning rotor blade. It damages the rotors. You, anon, are living proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

>>1303979
see:

>>1300243
Use this picture as an example for the description below.
>>1300370
>>1300859

What makes a magnet "coherent" and able to induce magnetism is the fact that its dielectric inertia (Or bloch wall) has been made coherent due to induction from an electrical current. On a large scale the earth has coherency from rotating and making revolutions around the sun and this in turn makes the earth a giant electromagnet .However, the earth has various materials of various permittivities and permeabilities, densities etc. and this mitigates the coherent dielectric inertia and makes it incoherent. The center of earth or large masses such as earth has been said to have no "gravity", so therefore it is inert to a certain degree. This inert center and the spin of the crust creates the layers of various materials in the earth that are essentially just moving at different speed. Also the flipping of earths magnetic field in return makes certain materials rotate or align differently and there is plenty of evidence of this in paleomagnetism. What helps the most however is the natural precession of earth combined with the influence of the moon to help disperse and dampen dielectric inertia.
>>1303987

>Also news flash, no law of physics explains what anything is

Uhhh, that is basically what I have been saying this entire time. Or did you not read anything I said?

>It's all a description over time.

Good, keep thinking about this statement and never stop.

>You're using the fallacy of science and physics to fuel your own pseudo bullshit and rustle Jimmies.

>i'm using the fallacy of something to justify something that may not be full of fallacies and as a result, jimmy bobs are angry because they don't want to accept that things really are that simple.

Also this is not my own, as I've said before this is the combined work of Dozens of electrical engineers which gave you electricity.

>>1304033
LOL u make it like everything is wrong. Nor have you proven anything or provided a way to prove anything.

Please take your useless shit somewhere else until you figure out how to make it useful to normal people.

>>1304037

>LOL u make it like everything is wrong. Nor have you proven anything or provided a way to prove anything.
Prove what you moron?

>Please take your useless shit somewhere else until you figure out how to make it useful to normal people.

You are currently using a device that operates on the principles of magnetism and dielectric inertia.....

>>1304003
I'm trying to explain to these feebleminded normies that diffusion is not real, there is only convection.
It's so obvious when you apply convex reciprocity to the Kerr tensor. Entropy is NOT a metaphor unto or beside itself, it is an ALGORITHMIC invariance.

Prove me wrong, sheeple!

>>1304041
And you're currently using a device that uses cock inertia.

Noone can prove us wrong.

>>1304048
>getting this mad

I'm sorry that your magical particle accelerators use what are called "halbach arrays" to move said "particles" in the first place. I wonder what a "halbach array" could possible be made of to induce such a coherent stream of "particles".

>>1303966
>it also lost the recordings of said expedition
The ones that were televised and that we have a multitude of 2nd-hand copies of now? If we've got the technology to put satellites in space you simply have to extend that to get a moon landing. All that's needed is an understanding of rocket mechanics and life support.

>>gravitational waves
"gravitational waves" = propagating fluctuations of the gravitational field. LIGO just measured how space was distorted by gravity as the two neutron stars orbited one another. Since we feel a different pull from the two stars being next to one another as opposed to them being one in front of the other. We can measure this gravitational force by measuring how much the length of two long interferometer arms change slightly.

>build
Semantics, I was just using as many different verbs as I could.

>never have to be corrected
Maybe if there were never any impacts from small space rocks, solar wind, or the gravity from the other planets.

>>1304057
Never said any of that.

You must have alot of voices in your head anon.

>>1304033
Quotes of your previous meaningless schizobabble, no testable hypotheses, nothing to demonstrate that gravitation can be explained in terms of electromagnetics.

You're getting everything totally wrong. A careful analysis of the effects of subvibrations on the eigenspace manifold will show that gravitation is indeed caused by particles possessing quaternion charge. With this picture, it should be obvious if you're not a moron (academic).

Also, Oliver Heaviside agrees with me, I think that settles the matter.

very relaxing thread i must say

Are the informations you are posting high of value?

>>1303966
Voidance is a word with fairly specific meanings - such as the annulment of a contract, or a vacancy in a benefice.

I assume from context you are not using either of those.

Using 'voidance' to mean 'empty' or 'vacant' suggests that it contains other meanings that those words alone do not satisfy (otherwise you could just use 'empty' or 'vacant' and have your words sound less like schizobabble).

Similarly, 'privation' means 'the loss or absence of a quality usually present', which sounds a lot like 'empty' or 'vacant', so are voidance and privation the same thing?

Please tell me what your meanings are for these words, as they don't appear in the usual dictionaries.

Do you write in green pen too?

>>1302313
Transgender youth commit suicide because society doesn't accept them. There's nothing wrong with being transgender, but there is something wrong with society. Society has bullshit expectations it expects people to conform to without any good reason.

>>1303753
Our incomplete knowledge of physics has allowed us to accomplish a lot, but that doesn't mean we should just sit on our collective asses and pretend we understand everything. We still have much to learn, and we learn new things every day.

>You're getting everything totally wrong. A careful analysis of the effects of subvibrations on the eigenspace manifold will show that gravitation is indeed caused by particles possessing quaternion charge. With this picture, it should be obvious if you're not a moron (academic).

So where the fuck is my gravity chamber for getting sick gainz like Vegeta?
"A quick analysis of effects over time will yield a definition to leprechaun particles "

Oliver Heaviside referred to the belief in particles as a "psychosis".

>>1304128

Yes, the magnetic fields lease was up so the dielectric kicked him out of the apartment(kind of).
"The act of voiding" would be the best definition. I did not use the term "empty" because "empty" does not exist in the universe. I did not use the term "vacant" because that would imply that there is a limit to what it contains. Privation as you stated, is the "loss or absence of a quality usually present". Like how shadow is a privation of light, or how light is a privation of magnetism and electricity, and how electricity is a privation of magnetism and dielectric inertia and how magnetism is a privation of dielectric inertia via larmor frequency. Is Dielectric inertia a privation of anything? How can a voidance have a privation? It can't. This is why science cannot explain it. Dielectric inertia is the silver in the two sided coin of waves and particles.

>>1304150
DAS RIGHT
CHALLENGE DAT SOCIAL NORM

>>1304163
It seems you are unable to refute my quaternion charge theory of gravitation. I'm surprised; the concept of posithetical flux should be simple to figure out for a mind unclouded by formal education. This intricate concept is fundamental to understanding the universe.

I guess you are just a moron.

Let me spell the derivation out for you:
1) Matter exists in a constant cycle of dysentropic collapse. Columbus demonstrated this with his egg breaking experiment.
b) From this, it logically follows that the cosmos is constrained by a synchroplectic feedback process
5) Thus, quarternial charge is responsible for gravitational attraction.

See, I've provided experimental evidence and rigorous formal deductions. Here is a random picture of some science-looking shit, to further establish the validity of my theory.

Go ahead, try to refute my theory. Until you can do that, nobody can take you seriously.

>>1304199
I don't get why people feel so strongly about denying transgender people their rights. Live and let live, who honestly gives a fuck if you identify as a man or a woman or a walrus. Doesn't hurt me if people are allowed to express themselves.

>>1304210
>>1304150
Trannies would commit suicide at much higher rates even in a perfectly tolerant hypersweden.

>>1304158
This banal statement, which every practicing scientist would agree with, lends zero credibility to the vague, pretentious bullshit spewed by OP.

>>1304150
>implying a significant population of those who attempt suicide do so solely because of outside pressures and not because of mental illness

>>1304217
And you think they wouldn't commit suicide if they were denied basic human dignity? I'm guessing you'd rather not have them exist in the first place? Well tough shit, they exist, and they're human beings who deserve human rights.

>>1304289
Mental illness can be caused and/or exacerbated by years of intolerance and abuse.

>>>1304158 (You)
>This banal statement, which every practicing scientist would agree with, lends zero credibility to the vague, pretentious bullshit spewed by OP.

How so? It's been an interesting discussion, but I'll admit that I don't even understand half of this shit. I just wanted to contribute something.

>>1304821
If someone thinks they are napolean you don't let him cut his shins off to finally feel at home in his own body.

>>1304826
Why not? It's a little messed up, but if it's their body, I say it's their choice.

>>1304832
Besides, if someone decides they want to cut off their shins because they think they're Napoleon, it honestly doesn't hurt or otherwise affect me. Live and let live.

>>1299708
Try this: Design Plasma Ionic Air Purifier CA-267

>>1304832
Well for one they are pumping children full.of drugs and telling them they are trans and shit when they aren't and pushing a narrative that they are normal.amd happy and you.sjould come.over and be a happy trans person.

In reality it is a mental disease and vanishingly rare. You shouldn't be letting these people mutilate their bodies instead of just accepting who they are and their own inner beauty and all that stuff they always teach for those after school specials.

>>1304835
Fuck this world.

>>1304840
You really think they're forcing it on kids? It wouldn't be right if they were, but provide me some concrete evidence that they are. I see where you're coming from, and I don't think kids should be given hormone therapy until they understand what they're getting into.

>>1304844
That's one of my personal morals, do what you want with your own body, but don't force anything on anyone else.

>>1304844
Also gay and lesbian couples hating their cis kids makes the news all the time too.

>>1304873
That's their problem. Being gay or trans doesn't make someone a good person. Even still, we should accept them the way we accept people of different races.

>>1304069
>particles possessing quaternion charge.

Quaternions are just a coordinate system.

>>1304821
>Mental illness can be caused and/or exacerbated by years of intolerance and abuse.
Oh certainly, but this is a mental illness that can be treated on a person-by-person basis, not by removing every little thing that might offend them from the world. Any sort of intolerance and abuse that isn't legally a crime or could otherwise be taken to court over is minor enough that my reply is simply "tough it out". People have claimed "emotional damages" over much less than throwing insults every day.

>>1304824
Well it's correct, but doesn't actually mean anything.

>>1304942
Never relaxing and encouraging them to make their own ethno states in their home countries?

>>1304824
>How so?

Because it means literally nothing other than "keep progressing". That doesn't mean you replace "I don't know" with shit you pulled out of your ass. Therefore, it lends no credence to the guy who keeps saying how the universe "doesn't care about math", which itself tells you how much he understands about the real world.

>>1304950
Hey, I don't see any problems with Scandinavians and Germans integrating in my home country. There's nothing wrong with different races (or genders or trans-ablists or whatever) as long as they are compatible with the majority. If mr "identifies as a Douglas fir" works 9-5, pays his taxes, and doesn't blow people up, I don't see a problem. Even if a bunch of somalian pirates showed up and became good hard-working citizens with no criminal activities then great!

Though I in no way am implying that there is no correlation between gender/race/etc. and being a tumor on society.

>>1304944
>complex numbers are just a coordinate system
>replying seriously to obvious mockery

>>1304821
>And you think they wouldn't commit suicide if they were denied basic human dignity?
I never even implied anything of that sort, you idiot. I do know that a number of them openly regret giving into their body dysphoria and have much worse lives after going through SRS. It's not as simple as you want it to be. Consider a non-trans, psychotic person with delusions that cutting off his foot would improve his life. Should society just shrug and let him go through with it, maybe let surgeons provide medical assistance? Live and let live, right? I guess it makes sense from a hyperlibertarian or darwinist point of view.

>>1304824
>I'll admit that I don't even understand half of this shit.
Don't worry about that, it's a schizophrenic person spewing meaningless bullshit decorated with scientific terms, and a bunch of people baiting him.
>It's been an interesting discussion
More sad than interesting.
>I just wanted to contribute something.
That's nice but please don't encourage pseudoscience. The fact that science has evolved over time and the scientific community has occasionally clung to incorrect ideas, is what pseudoscience shitters will always point out, thinking that their own bullshit with zero evidence or logic behind it is just as plausible as theories that have heaps of evidence and took centuries to figure out, little by little.

>>1305115
>That's nice but please don't encourage pseudoscience.

That's right, only trust academia and group think which gave you wonderful things like the gender spectrum, ethanol gas.

>The fact that science has evolved over time and the scientific community has occasionally clung to incorrect ideas, is what pseudoscience shitters will always point out. Thinking that their own bullshit with zero evidence or logic behind it is just as plausible as theories that have heaps of evidence and took centuries to figure out, little by little.

>thinking that their own bullshit with zero evidence or logic behind it is just as plausible as theories that have heaps of evidence and took centuries to figure out, little by little

All I used was logic, sorry you got so confused with terminology that EVERY SINGLE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER KNOWS. Maybe you're the ignorant one. If you honestly believe that I said anything wrong or incorrect then you are either misinformed or ill informed.

Also, even after all this time working with magnets the scientific community has failed to point out that magnets actually have centripetal/centrifugal vortexes. This of course was not found out by said scientific community, but a group of "pseudoscientists" specifically Ken Wheeler (who is a theoretical physicist) who has written an entire book about magnetism which can be found here https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small..

And do believe me when I say that no one else knows how a magnet works better than Ken Wheeler. You can even ask him yourself, he answers questions all the time and would be more than happy to tell you what an idiot you are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KooPsEE7E-Q

But that's all just "schizobabble" right? Now back to your magical, unquantifiable, "particulates". Now if you'll excuse me I have to shake the photon particles out of my monitor, they've been building up for awhile now.

>>1305241
Ken, the same guy who drew this? >>1300178
Insane Clown Posse (both of whom are theoretical physicists) clearly have a better understanding of magnetism than Ken. The shit he spouts is on the same level as >>1304207

Meaningless gibberish diagrams like that are characteristic of a subset of schizophrenics. Check out this guy, for example. His delusions are simply centered on windmills and solar arrays instead of electromagnetism.
http://www.windtops.com/

You have yet to explain the error of commonly accepted physics, other than some vague, completely inconsequential complaints about interpretation and semantics.
Every complaint you have comes down to the banal observation that at a deep enough level, physics only provides descriptions, not explanations. This is not some groundbreaking, controversial idea.

You have posted nothing that remotely suggests gravitational field equations reduce to maxwell's equations.

Can Ken's "theory" predict the forward voltage drop of a semiconductor?
Can it predict the Planck spectrum?
Hell, can it predict the emission spectrum of hydrogen?
You can show the calculations, or dodge the question with more schizobabble.

Here you claim that the commonly accepted laws of electricity are lies: >>1302313
Yet, now you hold up the field of electrical engineering as trustworthy. How many professional electrical engineers do you suppose would agree that conventional understanding of electricity and magnetism is wrong?

>Tesla and Heaviside invented things, therefore they are right about everything
appeal to authority
>And do believe me when I say that no one else knows how a magnet works better
appeal to authority
> (who is a theoretical physicist)
appeal to authority
>who has written an entire book about magnetism
appeal to authority

>>1305293
Well shit, that was actually the other schizo claiming circuit theory is false. The rest of my post still stands

The photoelectric effect

>>1305293
>Every complaint you have comes down to the banal observation that at a deep enough level, physics only provides descriptions, not explanations.
>This is not some groundbreaking, controversial idea.

you state this (which is true) and then you say.

>You have posted nothing that remotely suggests gravitational field equations reduce to maxwell's equations.

Would you please keep proving me right?

>Can Ken's "theory" predict the forward voltage drop of a semiconductor?
>Can it predict the Planck spectrum?
>Hell, can it predict the emission spectrum of hydrogen?
>You can show the calculations, or dodge the question with more schizobabble.

>predict

How do you predict an expression?

>>1305442
>predict
In this context, this term refers to when a mathematical expression produces a result the same as the experimental result. But these expressions are often derived from the very thing they describe. The difference between a meaningless self-referential description and one with external theoretical basis is that one with theoretical basis will follow basic laws of conservation of energy, momentum, leptons, dimensions, etc.

The prediction he is referring to is not a prediction of the expression that lets you make a prediction, but rather a prediction of the experimental results themselves.

>>1305442
You said yourself that gravity doesn't exist, it's an electromagnetic phenomenon. Then all of gravitational phenomena should be possible to describe by maxwell's equations. Are you retarded?
Besides, if everything is just hurf durf dielectricity, it should be possible to state maxwell's equations exclusively in terms of the D field. Why don't you show me how?

>The dielectric is a VOIDANCE, that is to say it is INERTIA and pure potential. The "CONTAINER" of this energy if you will is MAGNETISM. Magnetism gives three dimensional to the world by storing the LOSS OF INERTIA coming from Dielectric.
Whoops, there's more of that vague, incoherent pseudoscience, complete with capitalization as a substitute for reason. What are the units of dielectric, or dielectric field, or dielectric inertia, or pure potential, or whatever else? There's no semblance of a proper definition of any of the bullshit terms you throw around, and they're obviously not the same as what you would find in an evil, brainwashing academic textbook.

>How do you predict an expression?
You don't, you predict the outcome of an experiment. The expressions come from the underlying theory.
It seems that whatever the fuck Ken thinks is wrong about conventional physics, his own ramblings are unable to produce relevant expressions that have predictive power. Are you admitting that the bullshit you peddle adds nothing, explains nothing and describes nothing?

But wait, you said that
>the scientific community has failed to point out that magnets actually have centripetal/centrifugal vortexes.
That sounds an awful lot like there is some observable magnetic phenomenon, previously unnoticed, that Ken is able to describe with some sort of expression! I wonder what experiment he performed, and with which falsifiable hypothesis?

>>1305462
You're talking to some retarded photographer who's pulled this bullshit to sell his book on /sci/ before.

>>1305565
I realized long ago that it is indeed the fat chucklefuck linking to his own videos here >>1305241. I think that's why I just can't stay away from this trainwreck. Also because people like trans acceptance anon might think it's actually not 100% steaming bullshit.

>>1299708
Yes. Used all the time in HVAC.

http://www.nucalgon.com/products/iaq/iWave-R

/thread

>>1305579
>/thread
If only it were that easy.

>>1305293
I'm high on DXM and this shit is hilarious.

>>1305115
So, after going through all the therapy and preparations beforehand, who regrets going through SRS? Don't they do stuff to weed out people who aren't 100% sure?

>>1305696
Sadly it's a bit of a fad.

>>1305696
> Don't they do stuff to weed out people who aren't 100% sure?
Yeah, they know it'll take a lot of effort even after the surgery is done, but I guess it's hard to picture just how laborious and disgusting it is to maintain what is basically an open wound trying to heal, with no going back.

>>1303542
>I like coffee

So there is at least one thing we agree on


Do you prefer drip coffee or espressos?

You mean to generate Ozone? Easy, any electrical arc generates ozone, tesla coils just happen to make some beautiful arcs. I've made a few in my time, they are quite fun. SSTC and DRSSTC. Commercial and comsumer ozone water purifiers have been around for a long time.

>>1300055
>Goes around them naturally
No they reflect and refract.
>...Repulsed by physical objects
No, it bounces off these objects

>>1300048
>Science doesnt know what gravity is
>Still dont know what mass is
Wrong, just because you fail to grasp the concepts and are far too retarded to read into real science yourself doesn't make it wrong.
Mass is caused by energy creating permutations of space-time.
Gravity is caused by this mass forcing space-time away from it.

>Inb4 hurr durr if its pushing space time out how do objects fall together due to gravity
Just another aspect you fail to grasp. If you want to actually learn how this all works I would suggest reading the actual literature and not crack pot theories that have no grasp on reality.

What the fuck is this thread?
>>1305792
>>1305696
The problem with the homo community is that ``support'' is actually called ``peer pressure'' in more sane parts of the world. They're so thirsty for new blood that they forget about looking after the best interests of their new members.

Impressionable young retards get goaded by all of the new friends they just made to take all these mind altering drugs that will make them the belle of the ball, and then do all these things, including surgery, to find your true self...because of course, your true self is absolutely the crap we have been repeating all this time, even though there's no chance that we even entertained the other possibility.

Sound familiar?

>>1300697
Yeah, ionizing O2 will produce O3. That weirdly awesome smell of a photocopier? It's the air being turned into ozone from the scanner.

That said, I'm sure there is some kinda threshold or something before the molecules transform.