[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/diy/ - Do It Yourself

View post   
File: 65 KB, 849x924, internal gear.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281341 No.1281341 [Reply] [Original]

Did I draw this right? It's supposed to be an internal gear.

>> No.1281342

>>1281341
i'm not putting that around my dick

>> No.1281346

>>1281341
look like theyre cut too deep

>> No.1281349

>>1281341

Perspective is wrong

>> No.1281350

>>1281346
That's what I was thinking. I followed online instructions for drawing a spur gear and just arrayed the tooth forms inwards instead of outwards and that's what I got. I can't actually find instructions specifically for internal gears.

>> No.1281351

>>1281349
What do you mean?

>> No.1281353

>>1281350
>I followed online instructions for drawing a spur gear
i don;'t know what program you're using but can you do the same with an ext gear inside and mesh them?

>> No.1281354

>>1281349
Your eye is better than Autocad? Amazing.

>> No.1281361

>>1281354
maybe he doesn't like THICC

>> No.1281363
File: 14 KB, 360x270, yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281363

>>1281354

Yes.

At near the bottom center there is a twist, it is wrong.

On the right outter ring, the foreground should over take, but in this drawing, the background of the ring does.

ITS FUCKING WRONG.

>> No.1281367

>>1281363
>On the right outter ring, the foreground should over take, but in this drawing, the background of the ring does.

I've read this sentence five times and have no fucking clue what in the actual fuck are you even trying to say.

>> No.1281374
File: 31 KB, 546x452, sucking womans toe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281374

>>1281367

well, i'd suggest looking at ops ring and the ring posted. Notice the perspective of the drawn one doesnt match the real one?

Yeah, I noticed that too.

>> No.1281428
File: 50 KB, 467x397, i.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281428

>>1281374
>orthographic projection is too hard for my brain to handle

>> No.1281433
File: 23 KB, 500x500, internal-spur-gear-500x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281433

>>1281367

It's easier for a layman to understand when there are two gears like this.

hth!

>> No.1281434
File: 91 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281434

>>1281367

And sometimes it helps the novice to see an animation. I know it helped me a lot when I was an undergrad struggling with gearing.

>> No.1281437

>>1281434

shit. It's not playing for me.

>> No.1281461

OP here, why has my thread descended into autism?
>>1281353
I'll do that.

>> No.1281477
File: 936 KB, 644x644, where_do_you_think_we_are.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281477

>>1281461
>why has my thread descended into autism?

>> No.1281485
File: 33 KB, 400x356, not_autism_pure_intelligence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281485

>>1281477

He must not be a regular here.

>> No.1281527

ITT,
>>1281349 >>1281363
doesn't understand the fucking concept of a parallel (non-perspective) rendering

>> No.1281536
File: 57 KB, 811x608, mike_democracy_loerl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1281536

>>1281527
>parallel (non-perspective) rendering

and that's the issue. normal ppl don't want that shit seymore.

>> No.1281630

>>1281477
>>1281485
I used to be a regular here.

>> No.1281947

>>1281363
I'm 99% sure this is due to different projection schemes

>> No.1281950

>>1281536

Most CAD is done this way senpai

>> No.1282048

OP here I guess the answer to my question is "yes" then. Thanks.