[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/diy/ - Do It Yourself


View post   

File: 512 KB, 2048x1532, Full Cryptex HELLODIY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088253 No.1088253 [Reply] [Original]

So I finally put my ass in gear and finished the cryptex I designed and started around this time last year. I haven't really posted on /diy/ before, but I have a sneaking suspicion that this flavor of content would be appreciated here.

Tools used:
CNC router
Bridgeport mill
Lathe
Propane torch and silver solder
Heat treatment oven(because I had to anneal one of the damn tubes, knew a guy)
Files
Sandpaper
Grinder
Arbor press
Metal stamp set
Patience, lots

Materials used:
1.5" OD x 0.063" 4130 steel tube
1.375" OD x 0.063" 4130 steel tube
0.125" 304 stainless steel plate
0.25" 6061-T6 aluminum plate
0.25" black acetal sheet
2" brass round stock
2 small pieces of mystery scrap steel
0.0625" x 0.25" acetal dowel pins
#4-40 screw

Pre-assembly part count: 41 pieces
Post-assembly part count: 36 parts

Number of possible combinations: 2,821,109,907,456
Chances of opening purely by feel because decoy slots: 1 in 390,625
Weight: 2.2 lbs/1 kg

>> No.1088254
File: 460 KB, 2048x1532, Opened Cryptex Display.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088254

Opened view

>> No.1088255

>>1088253
Seen these before, got 2 questions:
>1. WTF do these things do?
>2. How do they do it?

>> No.1088256
File: 340 KB, 2048x1532, Lock Tube Detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088256

Lock Tube

>> No.1088257
File: 413 KB, 2048x1532, Assembled Mechanism Tube Inside Detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088257

Inside view of the mechanism tube

>>1088255
1: It's basically a fancy cylindrical puzzle box
2: Have patience, there are detail shots for each component but I can only post so fast

>> No.1088259
File: 401 KB, 2048x1532, Retaining Ring Detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088259

Retaining ring for keeping the rings in place while locked

>> No.1088260
File: 499 KB, 2048x1532, Spacer Ring Detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088260

Spacer ring gives the teeth somewhere to stay out of the way and separate the combo rings in a visually pleasing way.

>> No.1088261
File: 886 KB, 2048x1532, Assembled Combo Ring Right.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088261

The "back" side of one of the assembled and pinned combination rings.

>> No.1088263
File: 977 KB, 2048x1532, Assembled Combo Ring Left.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088263

The "front" side of an assembled combo ring showing the 4 decoy slots to make manual cracking almost impossible(only time will tell).

>> No.1088264
File: 1.29 MB, 2048x1532, Combo Ring Component Detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088264

Combination ring disassembled into the outer character ring, the inner slip ring that does the actual locking, and the indexing pin used to set the character for each assembled combo ring.

>> No.1088265
File: 288 KB, 674x655, strains the mind a bit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088265

+1 OP

>> No.1088266
File: 581 KB, 2048x1532, Disassembled Cryptex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088266

The cryptex fully disassembled showing how the lock tube sits in the slot when closed. Also shows the locking notch for the retaining ring at the right end of the mechanism tube. Lastly shows the stack of spacer rings and combo rings laid out.

>> No.1088269

Now make a fail-safe that releases acid or something to destroy the contents if tampering is detected

>> No.1088270

Who among you seeks to further satisfy their desire for knowledge via long distance textual discourse?

>> No.1088272

>>1088269
I personally don't find that extra effort to be worth my time. The alignment on the combo rings needs to be pretty spot on for it to open at all. I have had to fiddle with the rings more than a few times now in order to get it open, and I actually know what the combo is. Everything is a very close fit so that it is nearly impossible to feel what the hell is going on, and if you do feel a tooth "drop in" there is a 4 in 5 chance that it wasn't the actual slot opening. I don't think it needs any further tamper resistance, besides acid would ruin it and then I would be sad.

>> No.1088276

>>1088270
TL:DR "Who has questions?"

>> No.1088278

No questions, but that's dope, man. Nice work there.

>> No.1088280

So its a large bike lock? If you think your false setting improvisations are any good, just watch a master lock picker open a similar lock. I don't think those rounded edges would lead to many false sets.

For what purpose? An angle grinder could get it open in about 3 minutes. Swap out the acetal pins for steel pins; it will stop heat as an attack point for the lock.

>> No.1088282

Send to this guy: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp1orOGJwZvjLAvckyxC4Nw
Watch him crack it.

Or any professional locksmith really. That guy just has a higher chance of making a video about it.

>> No.1088291

>>1088280
It locks stuff inside it. I do plan to give someone I know that picks locks the chance to crack it. The teeth aren't really rounded, they have a steep taper to them. When I was doing the final filing of the teeth they would set into the slots pretty readily, but now that they are all even I haven't been able to feel any of the slots. That and you have to pull fairly hard to open it means you can't exactly jiggle it while you go through the rings.

It's primarily a novelty. Any properly equipped person could destroy it to get to the contents, sure. The black slip rings are also acetal and if I did switch out the pins for steel ones you could possibly use a magnet to find them and use that to position the rings and unlock it. I did consider using something that would severely reduce the effect of heat on it, but I don't reasonably expect that to be something it should encounter. Acetal lets it slide smoothly and was easy to work with.

>> No.1088304

>>1088272
If the message would be written on very thin paper you could probably dissolve it with a small amount of acid. Coating the inside would prevent much damage to the metal. A very thin-walled glass vial containing the acid could then just be inserted with the paper around it, for the real Da Vinci Code feel + absolute security of the message. Still I wouldn't recommend it, because nobody truly uses this for message safekeeping but just because it's an awesome project and object to have, which it is

Very well done, quality threads like these are what makes /diy/ such a good board, no matter the amount of "hey I want to buy X but I want to spend basically zero money so I'll just shoot down all advice until the thread dies" threads.

Again, very well done and thanks for the good photo's and commentary

>> No.1088307

>>1088304
Thanks. This was not a cheap project for me as I wasn't entirely sure how I wanted everything. Originally it was going to have brass character rings, because brass looks fucking awesome, but the 0.125x4 inch bar was 0.115 in the middle of the bar and 0.135 on the outer edges. I would have had to machine it flat first and then I would be lucky to have the sheet be 0.1 thick, too narrow for the stamps I had.

I've learned a lot about material selection from this project.

>> No.1088327

>>1088307
I can imagine that. I've just started working with metal (small milling machine) and I've learned already that choosing steel equals needing to have a lot of patience and really hard milling bits. Cool stuff though

>> No.1088335

>>1088327
With steels it all really comes down to what alloy you are machining. 12L14 and 1215 are super machinable steels, but something like 1045 or 4140 have more carbon and other stuff mixed in which makes them stronger but tougher to machine. You can do a lot with HSS tooling in steel, but carbide can be run far faster and will deal with harder materials better.

>> No.1088342 [DELETED] 

>>1088253

>Not building it out of shipping containers or free pallets

>>>/out/

>> No.1088361

>>1088253
Cool as shit OP. Looks gorgeous. How many hours did it take you?

>> No.1088364

>>1088253
Fucking impressive, cant even imagine the amount of effort this would take

>> No.1088372

OP is not a faggot

>> No.1088410

>>1088253
Damn OP that's very fucking nice

>> No.1088422

>>1088266
where's the mechanism that destroys your secret shit with acid if someone tries to brute force the cryptex?

>> No.1088432

>>1088253
Now you just need to find a nice dungeon to leave it in, make sure to put an old key inside.

>> No.1088438

>>1088263
>>1088272
Are all the faults drops even spaced like that?
The first issue is they drop the number of combinations from 200B to 390K. The second is only 2 of the faults drops sort of land on letters basically giving the combo away.

Very cool build though and its not like it's something you're actually producing and selling.

>> No.1088440

Very well thought out and execution op.

>> No.1088520

>>1088342
lol
>>1088361
somewhere between 30 and 40 hours, but if I did another one it would be far less time spent.
>>1088432
Now I plan to use this in a DnD campaign.
>>1088438
You are correct, they are evenly spaced. Now that you point out the alignment issue I should have done 5 decoys plus the real slot. As it is the alignment of the characters isn't perfect which will help hide that, but mostly its that the slots are 0.188 wide and the teeth are 0.17 at their widest and taper to a significantly smaller face size where they would actually drop in. 390k is still a lot more secure than a 4 ring numeric bike lock which is only 10k and are still a reasonable impediment.

If I make any others I will incorporate a properly divisible spacing. Possibly I might also change the acetal slip ring to some metal.

>> No.1088544

>>1088253
That's nice as tits, good job OP

>> No.1088629
File: 3.06 MB, 3024x4032, image-20161028_231141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088629

A few pics of the machining process.

>> No.1088630
File: 1.13 MB, 4032x3024, image-20160104_201222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088630

>> No.1088633
File: 1.20 MB, 3024x4032, image-20160104_194231.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088633

>> No.1088635
File: 257 KB, 1533x832, download_20151218_223604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088635

And one of the first renders of the cryptex.

>> No.1088736
File: 410 KB, 532x582, goood.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1088736

>> No.1088855

>>1088253
Good job.

>> No.1088946

>>1088253
Nice job OP!

>> No.1088978

>>1088630
So, how many of those little bits did you break?

>> No.1089082

>>1088978
At least 3

>> No.1089308

>>1088253
Now you need papire and vinegar. Also how did you shaped the letters in the rings?

>> No.1089310

>>1089308
Nvm i already saw the stamp mention

>> No.1089313

>>1088253
I accidentally clicked on this board but that looks cool. That's like some Da Vinci Code shit

>> No.1090805

Have a grabcad link

https://grabcad.com/library/cryptex-8

>> No.1091079

>>1088520
>Now I plan to use this in a DnD campaign.
That's actually a great idea.

>> No.1091082

>>1088269
>acid
>>1088304
>acid
>>1088422
>acid
>>1089308
>vinegar

hurr durr...

Most acids do not dissolve paper. Neither papyrus.
In particular, vinegar (even 100% acetic acid) is not able to damage paper / papyrus.

Several strong acids damage paper, as well as your skin and any other organic matter. For instance H2SO4. Turns organic matter into coal. Or HClO4. Explodes. Bad idea in general.

>> No.1091361

>>1091082
I don't think the point is to dissolve the paper, maybe just destroy the ink?

>> No.1091382

>>1088253
i really hope the pass is heil odin

>> No.1091407

This is one of the best posts I've seen on /diy/ in a long time. Thanks OP

>> No.1091416

>>1091407
This!

I love ingenious machining porn. Post moar of your work OP.

May the labes of babes drape your dong,
May you grow rich and be happy,
May you make even moar delightful objects.

>> No.1091425

>>1091082
>>1091361
Maybe just use black ink instead of vinegar then ?

>> No.1091813

Great work!! Looks amazing! The only constructive crit i can drop is maybe you would consider a bit more buffing to make it shine more.

>> No.1091815

>>1091082
The weak acid if for the ink not the paper.

>> No.1091827

What's the password faggot

Also props

>> No.1091867

>>1091827
password

>> No.1092173

>>1088629
is that a screw machine?

>> No.1092218

>>1092173
Close. That is a turret lathe. More of a non-automated screw machine

>> No.1092270

>>1092173
>>1092218
Hardinge HC lathe. That one doesn't have the 8 position carriage stop however, which is a damn shame. Awesome machines at making a lot of the same part in a hurry.

>> No.1092378

Great project OP, wish the place I work at had the machinery to make this, seems like a lot of fun.

>> No.1092429

>>1088253
wish there was a site that sold these, can only find plastic ones

>> No.1092781

>>1091382
I'm pretty sure it says 'Hello /diy/' But still, nice find. I didn't even notice it the first time.