/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1299918
>Granted, I was mistaken to mix your explanation with my pix, it is a completely different subject

My bad, I'm just hyped/pissed off after having a "0 and 1" conversation on x, (chaos and the principle) and getting nowhere because some people just can't accept that 0 AND 1 are "not a number". Now that we're on the subject though,

>If the waveforms were to stop resonating, they would cease to exist

When I jump into a pool and start splashing around creating waves in the water with my hands am I creating something new called a "wave" or am I just moving what's already there?

>there is no evidence of a waveform not moving, from which you can deduct the following: everything we perceive is in fact a waveform, not simply what it does.

A waveform of what though? This is why you can't use deductive reasoning, rather abductive reasoning. You can deduce nothing from something that cannot be observed, you aren't even "complete" enough to make such an observation. If something cannot come from nothing, then the universe never began. If something cannot turn into nothing, then the universe will never end. So since this can only be defined as "incomplete" (and even that is incorrect), the only logical explination would be:

The universe is self-similar and holographic in nature. It derives only from itself in order to complete itself. Since it is not complete it does not exist as its own thing then;

Nothing can exist but change.