/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1217123
I don't wrong there's anything wrong about our understanding of engine designs, but the chemistry may not have entirely been what we were lead to believe.

Car manufactures have been known to purposefully exclude technology from the general public.
The electric car conspiracy is one such example. In 1994, the 'General Motors Company' GM bought control of the NiMH batteries. They had 77 working (Gen-II) NiMH EV1 cars, which could have been sold for $25,000 each, but GM refused to sell. GM sold the patent to Texaco which was acquired by Chevron about a week later.

Toyota set up a production line in 1997 for the Toyota RAV4-EV, which used the perfected “large-format” EV-95 batteries. Chevron then sued Toyota.

http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?p=690
http://www.winonarenewableenergy.com/blog/ev-batteries-are-being-held-hostage
http://www.ev1.org/

Getting back to the main topic, in order to prove to myself as to whether or not a HHO improves the fuel efficiency of a car, the road will need to be mostly flat. Take about 5 video recordings of the Dynamometer (1 per 10 min) while at the same speed, first with the cars original O2 sensor and then again with the EFIE, all without the HHO unit installed.

Then I do the same with the HHO generator connected and drawing 12 (13.5) Volts from the Battery, only switching it on immediately when the car starts.

Will this give me a definitive result?

Your lack of curiosity has kinda bummed me out though.