/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1300254
>I cannot say that I will agree with your statements and claims. Simply for this reason: nothing cannot actually exist.
True, but also everything at once cannot exist either because then it would be complete and have no change. The concrete would not move.
>You concrete example is a rather materialistic way of perceiving the subject, is it not?

Not at all because to have material (concrete) you have to have to have the lack of material as well (voidance).

>Unfortunately we have not of evidence of stillness, yet.

True, but in order for something to move it has to have the space to do so.

>I believe my point eludes you as well. The blame is to be put on the english language as we all have different definitions of different concepts, lets try this: the proper way to describe it in the english language would be to use the term: electrical resonance = waveform = electrical/magnetic field. The idea of 'potential' is a philosophical term, unfortunately mixing this term into the understanding of physics is quite the heresy.

No I completely understand what you're saying, what I'm telling you is that to have a wave there has to be a difference in the first place, therefore a wave is a posterior attribute to the interaction of voidance and countervoidance. It is an expression of space and counterspace.