/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1300693
>Eh, semantics. It was invented and went on to disprove the aether as a medium for light waves.

ah see there you go, as a MEDIUM.

>A field, vector or scalar, has an amplitude at any given co-ordinate.
I'm not talking about it's magnitude or amplitude. Those are descriptions, not explanations.
Where is the ORIGIN of said amplitude? You will never find it because it is incommensurate, it will not follow any "maths" you plug into it because the universe does not understand math.

>The idea of having a field without a specific value at any given point would carry no information, and hence describe nothing
"incommensurable" Does not mean it is not there. It means the measurement keep changing with NO COMMON MEASURE. It is "keeping up with itself" so to speak. forever seeking pressure mediation. It is SOMETHING affected BY the ABSENCE of ITSELF. It is not complete, therefore the sum of it's part is also "not complete". This is the only reason things "grow" from the derivatives of something else and then "shrink" into derivatives for something else. "It will exist" would be a more accurate term.

>articles such as the electron do have a basis in reality, that's what the oil drop experiment and Einstein's photoelectric effect proved.

Proved what? That the "electron" has "weight"? What is "weight" other than medium specific, vector specific, and all these other factors that basically say that "weight" is DEPENDENT on more than one variable. Did they do the test on a mountain? Did they do the test underwater? How vacuum sealed was the drop chamber? What is a vacuum? Can a true one exist?

You can break it down all you want to, it's all the same shit don't you get it? All you're doing is getting literally getting closer to NOTHING. The THING, AND the ABSENCE of the thing to ensure that you aren't left with:

1. JUST the THING(everything with no change)
2.JUST the ABSENCE of the THING (nothing)