/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>2704158
>>2704178
Yes

It's not outside the realm of possibilities.

>>2531818
Burn trash in a gas turbine. Nigger rig a belt from the turbine to your refrigerator.

>>2531833
Looks like a turbojet engine.

>>2531841
>just a tiny shade over zero carbon footprint until the decomposition process finishes
Decomposition is inefficient. Better to cremate in a turbine.

>>2521157
> Why would I heat cold air from outside when I have perfectly chilled cold air inside already
Chad thermodynamicist reporting. The stove is a thermosiphon that sucks out warm/hot air and sucks in cold air which completely negates any benefit.

>>2520251
I hate poachers

>>2520251
>>2520304
>attach blades to a rod and spin it
>"but turbines are really expensive bro"
>"The average person in the 19th century couldn't build a turbine."

>>2520272
kek

>>2520273
Or use a Quasiturbine rotary engine with a flexible stator. It would require the same amount of tools the first Watt engines used, but would seal better. Not that a precisely built Stirling engine would be efficient without ceramics to begin with.

>>2520514
>freeze until you have to change your oil or
>remind your neighbors that their car is due for an oil change
Or just burn everything in one catch all engine.

A wood turbine engine
https://youtu.be/E-8BX7dUk5c [Embed]
https://youtu.be/i-UnhAzTMxg [Embed]

>>2504527
Woodgasifiers for piston engines are costly. A wood-burning turbine engine is much simpler.
https://youtu.be/E-8BX7dUk5c
https://youtu.be/i-UnhAzTMxg

>>2505075
Stirling engines are pretty inefficient without ceramics which are not trivial to cast or machine.

>>2507844
>there is no ghetto way to do this.
Just proved you wrong m8

>>2512107
>tar and resin
Burn that shit

https://youtu.be/i-UnhAzTMxg