/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1713205
>we could if (((they))) didn't build them like shit.

THIS

>>1597726
>You've posted the exact same goddamn thread 9 times now by my count, and that's not including the other threads you've either made without your trip or threads from others you've shitted up.

I post exclusively with my name, those are other posters that are housepilled as well - in fact a guy here that posts Stave churches knows more than I and after reading one post of his it clicked with me (kudos to Stave church anon!).

My point is that IT IS the material choice since you know that using LDF would make houses even worse despite Tyvek. craftsmanship is not the problem, you cant make an apple pie that I like (as a big tits V8 muslce car man) without apples.

>>1580057
>on the other side wrong modern paint doesn't allow diffusion of water can destroy even big 300yo timbers in 10 years by trapping water underneath the paint not allowing the wood to dry.

hear hear

that being said, Ive yet to see newer would build with extra poly2000 laquer that outlasts old stuff

>>1571072
another problem that vertical layering creates is moisture building in walls or in the house since water travels at different speed trough wood and at different speed trough brick wall.
If you have a thick monowall of whichever material the movement of the material is far more predictable.

>>1565623
ships or stave churches didnt used that much glue but rellied on extra long boards, joinery and sometimes softer glue

protip - wood should be cut down when old and acording to Moon changes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrI4ykDSjiQ

>>1512265
>look we found wooden bridge pillars in the mud.
Thankfully the art of preparing wood for the millennia is still well know. Pic. related is from 1150 and still stands.