/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.6513898]

Have you ever won an argument on /ck/?

[Anonymous No.6513922]

Most, but I've stepped in it, a time or two. And I really rip holes in people's universe on /pol/.

On /pol/, I've made myself look idiotic for not looking up a country's flag before I posted, which is half-assed of me, because I almost always research the subject before I post. I'm usually a high-strung hurried kind of person, but still...not knowing the flag beforehand is sloppy.

Once when I was a newbie here, I bickered w/a copy pasta post.

[Anonymous No.6513931]

>>6513898
>>6513922
>they think they can win arguments on the internet

[Anonymous No.6513956]

I don't argue so much as ridicule. I rarely present an opposing viewpoint. I just mock people for having X, Y or Z point of view without presenting one of my own. I've yet to ever be called out on it. People will assume I support some other opinion, but having never actually stated one, they get upset when I continue to mock their point despite them supposedly proving me wrong (how you can prove something wrong when I never made any claim, I'll never understand).

And I don't even ridicule or mock in a witty way, either.
Someone will say something like
>X is the best food to eat with Y
and I'll respond something like
>that's fucking stupid and so are you
Then they'll defend X with Y, attack putting Z with Y (even though I didn't say anything about Z with Y) and express his butthurt in a 500 word essay.
To which, I'll respond with something like
>X with Y still isn't good and you still have shit tastes

Then they'll get more pissy or just be quiet.

When I do argue, I generally win but have had my anus handed me a few times, too. When that happens, I apologise for the argument.

[Anonymous No.6513960]

>>6513931
Why can't you? You have people that argue with feelings, and then you have those that debate with facts...it most certainly is achievable.

[Anonymous No.6513972]

>>6513956
This is the long way of saying "I'm a shitposter"

[Anonymous No.6513979]

>>6513972
True, but only sometimes. Rarely, even.

Most of the time, I post recipes and advice and OC and am helpful. Other times, I like to mock.

[Anonymous No.6513988]

>>6513898
Yeah, the other person stopped responding.

[Anonymous No.6513990]

>>6513922
> going on /pol/
> ever

Wow

[Anonymous No.6513995]

the only winning move is not to play

[Anonymous No.6513998]

>>6513995
faggot

[Anonymous No.6514019]

>>6513990
*shrugs*
I do daily, it is can be good for laughs. Plus I like how you get more obscure headline news worldwide I would sometimes not get on Drudge or Infowars.

[Anonymous No.6514021]

>>6513898
Yes. But the problem is that arguments here (and I mean 4chan in general) tend to devolve into manbaby insults, so usually it gets to the point where I just stop responding. I have shut down a few threads in my time here, just by posting enough facts and logic that even the shitposters stop. But that's few and far between. And sometimes even I'm guilty of being a tard, and egging people on by posting goofy, insulting shit. It's a disease with no cure except total abstinence.

[Anonymous No.6514026]

So when are we going to start arguing about arguing?

[Anonymous No.6514042]

>Arguing on the internet
Are you 12?

[Anonymous No.6514058]

>>6514042
Eh, debate is good. Arguing emotionally is healthy. Better this way than actual silly confrontations in person, no?

[Anonymous No.6514064]

>>6513922
Protip: 80% of the time, both sides think they won when the thread dies.

[Anonymous No.6514074]

I keep a checklist of all arguments I've won on /ck/.

I don't even suffer from autism, I just like to know I'm superior to those who dare argue with me.

[Anonymous No.6514075]

>>6514074
Thats kinda sad anon

[Anonymous No.6514079]

>>6514075
I disagree.
You probably have some mental checklist, you probably have vivid memories and can recite arguments you have had in the past. It makes no difference if I like to see the results in black and white.

[Anonymous No.6514083]

The last time I argued against someone on /ck/ was about the location of South Korea.
And I was called autistic at the end of it eventhough I was right. Gave up arguing ever since then.

[Anonymous No.6514112]

There were these two guys one time trying to suggest that authentic Italian pizza is the best kind of pizza.

Oh, I showed them.
I showed them good.

[Anonymous No.6514115]

>>6513922
>not looking up a country's flag
You literally hover over it

[Anonymous No.6514120]

>>6514083
Are you the guy who tried to say that Indian cuisine has had a strong influence on Korean cuisine and that Thailand, a country that has a history of Hinduism and is home to still-in-use Hindu temples today, wasn't as strongly influenced by Indian culture and cuisine as Korea was and that Korea is closer to India than Thailand is? Because that guy was an idiot, not autistic.

[Anonymous No.6514130]

>>6514120
No, some fucktard said that kimchi is Southeast Asian food, and South Korea is a Southeast Asian country because some SEA market in his place sells kimchi.

[Anonymous No.6514150]

Of course not. Why would inputting so much effort for literally, zero gain?

If you post sincerely here, you will be kicked, shit apon, spat at and lampooned.

I don't argue points here any more than I would stop by the monkey cage at the public zoo in order to engage the inmates in those same points there.

[Anonymous No.6514161]

>>6513898

No. But that's only because I think arguing with random anons on the internet, over food of all things, is retarded.

[Anonymous No.6514164]

>>6514130
Oh. Yeah, that guy's an idiot. You are not autistic, Anon.

[Anonymous No.6514165]

>>6513922
you are autistic

[Anonymous No.6514171]

>>6514079
Yeah but you are a flaming faggot dish washer. your food taste bad

[Anonymous No.6514178]

I've won every argument I've ever had on /ck/

Because unlike most people on this board I know how to cook properly

[Anonymous No.6514187]

>>6514178
No you haven't

[Anonymous No.6514192]

>>6514187
Yes I have. I've just won this one, haven't I? And my perfect record continues. Don't feel too bad. Somebody has to come in second place.

[Anonymous No.6514198]

>>6514192
Prove it then

[Anonymous No.6514200]

>>6514192
I know the thought of being somebody else is appealing, but don't pretend to be me.

[Anonymous No.6514206]

>>6514200
>4200
broes les not fite just chill out i got purps

[Anonymous No.6514220]

>>6514192
>saying I win means I win!
kek

[Anonymous No.6515996]

>>6513956
Honestly, I enjoy the snideness of this board. I probably laugh when I come on /ck/ more often than any other board. You're doing good work anon, thanks.

[Anonymous No.6516013]

>>6514074
You got raped by Oscar the Grouch as a kid, didn't you?

[Anonymous No.6516015]

>>6513922
>because I almost always research the subject before I post
If you have to do this, you don't have an argument. You just have an opinion that you're cherry picking facts for.

[Anonymous No.6516020]

>>6514079
Add another mark to your tally, anon.

[Anonymous No.6516485]

I don't think it's ever really possible to win an argument on 4chan in general. Unless you count the other person losing interest and no longer replying.

[Anonymous No.6516588]

>>6513898
What would a ck argument look like?

It's best to use cold water when boiling water versus hot water?

400 degrees is the best temperature for frozen pizzas, not 450?

Joey is the best food reviewer, not Ken?

[Anonymous No.6516646]

I see myself as "winning" every "argument" on /ck/, in that I'm never shown to be incorrect in a satisfactory way. Most of the time I never even get what I want. I tend to consider them conversations, I have no desire debate. But a blunt argument is not out of the question.

The arguments I "lose" are ones that more or less, from the beginning, are known to resolve to core axiomatic differences that for all we know might be genetically predisposed or even hardwired. The loss is from even taking part despite almost certainly knowing the outcome in advance.

[Anonymous No.6516647]

>>6513898

flunks 9th grade algebra 3 times
comes on chinese cartoon image board to "argue"
pathetic or just funny?
you decide

[Anonymous No.6516679]

>>6513898
i've won the beans in chili argument multiple times

[Anonymous No.6516685]

>>6513898
like with what? about food? Why would I argue about food? Arguing about things like food or music is stupid.
I have won political arguments many times, along with other conceptual stuff, but since Im 19, all the arguments Ive been in dont change people's perspective or opinion, they usually just run out of rhetoric to spout while Im still poking holes in their argument, they just get angry.
Its lulz worthy, but not satisfying

[Anonymous No.6516697]

>>6516685
NO YOU STUPID FUCKING NIGGER FAGGOT. NOT ARGUING IS TOTALLY ENTRY LEVEL SHIT TIER GARBAGE LIKE YOUR TASTE, IDEAS, PERCEPTIONS, AND PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR OWN SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE OF REALITY.

YOU'D BETTER ALIGN WITH THE COLLECTIVE RIGHT NOW. WE'LL BULLY YOU UNTIL WE'RE SATISFIED YOU'RE ENOUGH LIKE OUR IDEA OF THE GROUP. IT FEELS SAFER THAT WAY. WE'RE LIKE A HARDCORE BAND OF MARAUDERS, YEAH MAN, A BADASS DEATH SQUAD EXCEPT NOT AT ALL. WE'RE JUST OBNOXIOUS AND THRIVE ON GROUP THOUGHT.

NOW FUCK OFF WITH YOUR SHIT TIER OPINIONS AND YOU BETTER BE ARGUING IRRATIONALLY NEXT TIME I SEE YOU, FUCKHEAD. KILL YOURSELF TOO BY THE WAY.

[Anonymous No.6516699]

>>6514021
>manbaby insults
>getting upset that people on 4chan like to insult and shitpost
>not being able to convey points and having thick enough skin to continue on

[Anonymous No.6516702]

>>6516699

[Anonymous No.6516705]

>>6516015

Lol what

[Anonymous No.6516707]

>>6516702
Tell me a bit about your childhood, anon. What sort of relationship did you have with your mother? Did you get along with your father, was he in the picture?

Sit down and relax for a while, let's talk.

[Anonymous No.6516709]

>>6516702
Ah, you've made your point then? Are you tallying this as a win too?

[Anonymous No.6516769]

>Arguing on the internet

[Anonymous No.6516773]

>>6513931
It happens.

[Anonymous No.6516776]

Have you ever won an argument with a vegan?

[Anonymous No.6516780]

>>6516015
Not if you form your opinion based on your fucking research. Which is how research is supposed to work, did you know that?

[Anonymous No.6516783]

>>6516776
It doesn't happen.

[Anonymous No.6516792]

>>6516776
vegans don't have the energy to argue

[Anonymous No.6516796]

I can't tell but I always assume I win when they don't reply anymore.

The argument was about eating spaghetti with a fork and a spoon or with a fork alone

[Anonymous No.6516801]

>>6516792
That's the only thing they have energy for apparently.

[Anonymous No.6516816]

>>6516776
>Implying it's possible